Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Although a minority of people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to practice in the country where they did their training, others believe that they should be free to work in another country if they want to. It seems to me that people should be free in choosing where they want to work.
A minority of people who believe that professionals should work in the country where they got the training. These people are mostly the authorities who want their people to work for them. Although some people are patroit, they serve their own country out of love. People will ditch the opurtunities of working abroad and somehow will not be able to experience new chapters of their life. For instance, the engineers got an offer from a well famous company of united state but they still refused due to patroitism or not able to work on their wish.
The majority of people want to live their life according to their wishes. They want to accept any opportunity which will transform their life. They believe that if you want to work somewhere else, you should do it. In that case, people will not regret of trying a new workplace, instead they grow and experience new things. For instance, people went to study abroad and were working remotely, but got opportunity which they accepted and got successful.
In conclusion, it implies that people should be free in choosing what they want to do or where they want to serve. It is completely on their wishes not on some authority.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
You state a clear preference for freedom of choice in the introduction and conclusion, and you refer to both views. However, the discussion of requiring professionals to serve where they trained is only briefly explained: “the authorities who want their people to work for them” does not explore the possible public benefit, such as recovering the cost of training or addressing staff shortages. The argument for freedom is also general, and the examples are unclear rather than well supported. The response contains 229 words, below the required 250; the 34 words copied from the prompt are not counted. Develop each side with a specific reason and a relevant example, then explain more fully why you favour freedom.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow the broad direction of the argument. However, progression within the paragraphs is limited, and several ideas are placed together without a clear relationship. For example, the point about patriotism is followed by “People will ditch the opurtunities” without clearly explaining how this supports the requirement to work in the training country. Linking phrases such as “Although” and “For instance” are used, but the examples do not always connect clearly to the claims. Build each paragraph around one main point, explain it, and then use a directly relevant example.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use enough vocabulary to communicate the main topic, including “professionals,” “opportunity,” “work abroad,” and “patriotism.” However, the range is limited and some wording is inaccurate or unnatural, which can make ideas less clear. Examples include “a well famous company,” “new chapters of their life,” and “serve their own country out of love.” There are also spelling errors in “patroit” and “opurtunities,” and “united state” should be expressed more accurately. Aim for precise, natural collocations related to employment and migration, such as “a reputable company,” “career opportunities,” and “contribute to their home country.” Proofreading spelling and word forms would also improve clarity.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt some complex sentence forms, including “Although a minority of people believe…” and “For instance, people went to study abroad and were working remotely, but got opportunity which they accepted.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to affect fluency. The second paragraph begins with the incomplete sentence “A minority of people who believe that professionals should work in the country where they got the training.” In “they should be free in choosing,” the grammatical pattern is awkward; use “free to choose.” Other issues include “regret of trying” and missing articles in “got opportunity.” Practise complete sentence construction, verb patterns, and articles, while checking that each sentence has a clear subject and main verb.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.