Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It has become the contentious subject that the skilled workers should serve the nation where they completed their practice while, certain people suggest that they ought to operate anywhere they want. The primary objective of this composition is to elucidate both perspective and justify my stance.

Examining the former point, the fundamental argument the supporters would put forward is working in country where they have gained experience will not only benefit the society but the prosessionals too in many ways. Fistly, we will identity how it will be fruitful for the individual themselves. As, they will be no language barriers which they may by moving abroad. Moreover, some outstanding students usually get an offer to mindblowing job opportunities this will aid them to earn in a young age. Secondly, the residents will be benefitted in serveral ways they will be known of their doctors or any professional's language this will lead to effectiv communication between them. For example, if discussion will be convenient the problem solving ratios will be increased too.

On the other hand, those in favour of latter approach have their own arguments. To begin with, they claim that pupils wish to move abroad this will create chances for them to gain the enchanced and up to dated knowledge and they may flourish in numerous ways. In addition, experts may get exposure to many languages and in this was they get confidence to communication to internation clients easily. For example, improved expertise consequently, more awareness which will lead to developed confidence and more patient, client or customer ratio.

In conclusion, i will offer my position, there are convincing arguments both for and against the staying or moving away from own country. However, I certainly favour the former opinion.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both views and state a preference for professionals to remain in the country where they trained, so the main parts of the prompt are present. The first body paragraph gives relevant reasons, including familiar language and better communication with local residents. However, the position is not fully explained: the opening says you will justify your stance, but the conclusion only repeats that you favour the first view. The case for working abroad is also less clearly developed; claims about gaining “enhanced and up to dated knowledge” and confidence are not supported with a specific example or a clear explanation of how these benefits arise. Develop each side with a concrete example and explain why your preferred policy should outweigh the alternative.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “Examining the former point,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the discussion, and the contrast between the positions is easy to identify. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent overall arrangement and shows some flexibility in organising the argument. However, several links are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Firstly” and “Secondly” introduce points, but the explanation after them is sometimes difficult to connect, and “For example” is followed by a general claim rather than a specific illustration. Use clearer references and build each paragraph through reason, explanation, and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “language barriers,” “exposure,” “expertise,” and “communication,” and the reader can generally understand the intended discussion. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “fundamental argument” and “in favour of.” However, the range is limited by repeated general terms and noticeable spelling, word-form, and collocation errors. Examples include “prosessionals,” “Fistly,” “enchanced,” and “up to dated”; phrases such as “mindblowing job opportunities” and “patient, client or customer ratio” are also imprecise or unsuitable for an academic essay. Aim for accurate, natural collocations and choose specific terms that express the intended benefit clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrastive opening and clauses beginning with “which” and “if.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in articles, sentence boundaries, agreement, and verb forms sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. For instance, “As, they will be no language barriers” has an incorrect clause structure, while “if discussion will be convenient” uses an unsuitable verb form. The sentence beginning “some outstanding students usually get an offer” also runs several ideas together without clear punctuation. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly controlled subordinate clause, then check articles, subject–verb agreement, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.