Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
People believe that experiences should be required to work in the country where they did their training also they should be free to work in any country. While some people believe that professionals, sucj as doctors and engineers, should work in the country where they did training , others argue that they should be free to work any country. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own view.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people should be required to work in the country whee they did their training. The main reason is training in their country know about what causes and problems. this is because they work in their own country it would many benefits for them. For example, environment condition they know, no homesick, also safety. Moreover, training in their country will know problems and this can improve to reduce the problems or solve with some solution. Therefore, work in the country where they did their training will less benefits.
On the other hand, there are also strong arguments in favour of work in another country if they want. One main reason is that good jobs with more salary and other benefiths in that profeesionals like housing benefits and safety etc..,. this is because people want more oppurtunities in their roles definetly move to another country for better future. For instance, highincome, better safety and good environment. Furthermore, move to other country can improve some interactions with numerous people nad places. Therefore, move to another country if they want it is good for their carrer.
In conclusion, althrough people work in the country where they did their training has some advantages, also free to work in another country if they wish has several important benefits. After considering both sides, I believe that work in another country is more benefits because to explore other countries with new people, high income, safety and other benefits.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You address both sides of the question and state your preference in the introduction and conclusion, so the reader can identify your general position. However, the discussion is only partly developed: the first view is supported by points such as familiarity with local conditions and avoiding homesickness, while the second focuses mainly on salary, safety and opportunities. Some explanations are unclear or contradictory, especially “work in the country where they did their training will less benefits,” which appears to oppose the argument you have just made. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation or a relevant example, and make your position consistent throughout. The 48 words copied from the task prompt are not counted.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The response has a recognisable introduction, two body paragraphs presenting opposing views, and a conclusion. This gives it some overall organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are listed rather than clearly connected: “environment condition they know, no homesick, also safety” does not explain how these points support the argument. Linking phrases such as “On the one hand,” “Moreover,” and “Therefore” are used, but some are mechanical or introduce conclusions that do not follow clearly. For example, the first paragraph’s final sentence conflicts with its preceding claims. Use fewer formulaic transitions and make each paragraph develop one main idea in a logical sequence, with clear references between sentences.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “professionals,” “training,” “opportunities,” “salary,” and “benefits,” and the reader can generally understand the intended subject. However, the range is limited and several word choices or combinations are inaccurate, sometimes making meaning unclear. Examples include “training in their country know about what causes and problems,” “good jobs with more salary,” and “improve some interactions.” Spelling errors such as “sucj,” “whee,” “benefiths,” and “oppurtunities” also reduce accuracy. Build a more precise range for discussing professional migration, and check spelling and collocations. For instance, explain that professionals may understand local needs or seek higher salaries and broader career opportunities.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a concession in the conclusion and clauses introduced by “because” and “if.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make several sentences difficult to interpret. For example, “this is because they work in their own country it would many benefits for them” lacks a clear grammatical structure, while “move to another country if they want it is good for their carrer” joins clauses incorrectly. There are also problems with sentence boundaries, missing or incorrect articles, and verb forms. Practise building complete sentences around a clear subject and verb, and use punctuation to separate ideas. Accurate simple sentences should come before adding subordinate clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.