Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In contemporary society, the profession plays a major role in an individual's life. Some members of the public believe that the professionals such as doctors and engineers should work in the country where they got their training, while others believe that their professionals should be free to work in another country if they want. In my opinion, professionals should work in any country if they want because if they find that place comfortable and reliable then they are able to provide excellent treatment and their interpersonal relationship with the patients become better.

On the one hand, the professionals should work in the nation where they got their training. Furthermore, it is helpful in easy completion, implementation and evalution of task it results only when you are familar with every corner of that place. They are able to treat patient well Moreover, it is benefical for that hospital or workplace.

On the other hand, the doctors and engineers should be free to work in a different country according to their interest and choice. Additionally, it is fruitful for other nations that they provide care to another country patients and represent their own nation. For instance, many people from India work in many countries after completing their higher studies, graduation and training.

In conclusion, from my perspective one thing is clear that if the professionals work in their own nation or different they provide assistance in development as well as human progress. Moreover, which is advantageous for citizens and youngsters who are part of it and they together able to tackle any challenge.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address both views and state your preference for allowing professionals to work abroad, giving a relevant example of Indian professionals working in other countries. However, the discussion is only partial: the case for requiring professionals to stay is asserted through “familiar with every corner of that place,” but the benefit to the country that trained them is not clearly explained. The opposing view is also supported mainly by a general claim that other nations benefit from their care, without a specific explanation or example. Your conclusion says professionals contribute whether they stay or leave, but does not clearly reinforce why freedom of choice is preferable. Develop each side with a clear reason and a concrete example, then link your conclusion directly to your stated opinion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the broad organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and some links are unclear or mechanical. For example, “Furthermore” and “Moreover” introduce points that are not fully explained, while “Moreover, which is advantageous…” is not clearly connected to the preceding sentence. The first supporting paragraph also runs ideas together, particularly around “They are able to treat patient well.” To improve, organise each body paragraph around one main reason, explain it, and use clear sentence boundaries and references so each point follows logically.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “professionals,” “training,” “treatment,” “patients,” and “development,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “human progress.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, which can make meaning less clear. Examples include “their professionals,” “easy completion, implementation and evalution of task,” and “provide care to another country patients.” Spelling errors such as “evalution,” “familar,” and “benefical” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural phrases rather than adding formal-sounding words: for example, explain that professionals can “contribute to the healthcare system” or “apply their skills abroad.” Check spelling and use collocations in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “if they find that place comfortable and reliable then they are able to provide…” and contrast between the two views. However, the range remains limited, and errors occur frequently enough to sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. For example, “their interpersonal relationship with the patients become better” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “it is helpful in easy completion… it results only when…” is an incomplete and confusing construction. “They together able to tackle” is also missing a verb. Punctuation and sentence boundaries need attention, as in “They are able to treat patient well Moreover…”. Practise building accurate complex sentences and check agreement, articles, plurals, and complete clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.