Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

A number of people believe that professionals, like doctors and engineers, should work in the country where they completed their studies and did training. Because there are more number of deserving people. On the other hand, some people believe that they should be free to work in any country where they want. But I would argue that it should be professionals will that in which country they want to work.

First and foremost, a number of people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers do to much hard work for their studies and training so, it should be their right to work whereever they want. Most often they have to concentrate on studies for more than 4 years, hence if they want to move to foreign countries, state should not have any right to stop them. On the othe hand, when younger professionals meet their seniors and with those who are more experienced, they are more likely to learn from them. It wil not only enhance their knowledge but in resulting their exposure towards practical life will dramaically increase. For instance, when experts from all over the world meet with one another, they share their experience. They are more likely to develop a useful product which can be beneficial for whole humanity.

Whereas, a large proportion of people believe that there are more number of people who need assistance from their skilled people. People who move to other countries for better work opportunities mostly belong to developing nations. Since their government is financially weak but they still invest for the education of youth. Therefore, morally it becomes the responsibility of professionals to serve their own nation first. For example, Pakistan government has launched many medical scholarships but once students complete their MBBS, they are more likely to move to abroad countries.

To conclude, although there are many people who believe that professionals should give priority to their countries. As it becomes their morally responsibility. But there are also some people who have opinion that if they want to gain professional experience they should move to other parts of world, if they want. But I strongly believe that it should be individual's will where they want to work.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You discuss both positions and state a clear view: professionals should be free to choose where they work. The argument for mobility is supported by points about professional development and sharing expertise, while the opposing view is illustrated with Pakistan’s investment in medical scholarships. These are relevant responses to the task. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the benefits of working abroad are explained in more detail, whereas the claim that professionals owe service to their country is mainly asserted as a moral responsibility. The opening point about there being “more number of deserving people” is also unclear. Explain the competing interests more precisely and develop the example by showing how professionals’ departure affects access to services or public investment.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate discussion of the two views, and a conclusion that restates your opinion. Paragraphing generally helps the reader follow the argument, and connectors such as “On the other hand,” “For instance,” and “To conclude” signal relationships between ideas. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow. In the first body paragraph, the shift from professionals’ right to choose to the benefits of meeting experienced colleagues is not clearly explained. The conclusion also repeats the opposing view rather than synthesising the discussion. Some linking phrases are mechanical or awkward, and “Whereas” begins a paragraph without a clear clause to contrast. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each example directly to the point it supports.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “professional experience,” “financially weak,” “medical scholarships,” and “practical life,” and you attempt more specific expressions such as “beneficial for whole humanity.” This gives you enough range to communicate the main ideas, but several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making the meaning less precise. For example, “more number of deserving people” and “move to abroad countries” do not express the intended ideas naturally; “dramaically” is also misspelled. “Exposure towards practical life” is an awkward combination. Aim to learn vocabulary in common word partnerships and check spelling, especially in key phrases. More precise terms for public investment, workforce shortages, and professional freedom would strengthen the discussion.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses with “since,” “when,” and “although,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and punctuation are frequent enough to make some sentences difficult to process. The opening fragment, “Because there are more number of deserving people,” is not a complete sentence. In “it should be professionals will,” the clause structure is faulty, while “when younger professionals meet their seniors and with those who are more experienced” has an incomplete parallel construction. The conclusion’s “although” sentence is also left without a complete main clause. Practise building complete sentences around one clear main clause, then add subordinate clauses; review articles and subject–verb agreement, and use commas to separate clauses accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.