Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-01
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Education play an important role in each individual life due to this few individual reckon that professionals should required to work in the nation where they did training while oppent believe that they free to chose work in another countey. in my opinion latter statement is more logical however both aspect discusion in upcoiming paragraph.
on the one hand, threr are plethora of reason why people are free to chose to work in another country. the first and foremost reason is better salaries. to explain it working in abroad they provide better salary to employes and also other ferlicity such as free house, chancu to explore new culture and peolpe learn new thinks in their life . apart form this working in other country help to make independent because they need to manage all think themself .
on the other hand,threr are many relational why people work in own country . if government invest money spend on education and professional training due to this professional such as doctors and engineers also repay back to their country to achivement and alos same new invention which help to improve the life of their country people life
to conclude it , i restate my opinion, working in other country give chance to explore new cultureand also provide better salaries
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You present a relevant opinion—“the latter statement is more logical”—and include reasons for both views: better salaries and cultural experience for working abroad, and returning value to a country that funded training. However, the discussion is only partial and the position is not sustained in the conclusion, which repeats benefits of working abroad without clearly weighing the opposing view. The ideas are also under-developed: for example, explain why public investment in training creates an obligation to serve locally, and support your points with a specific example. The response is 34 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop both sides and your opinion. Address every part more fully and make your final position explicit.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a basic overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “on the one hand,” “on the other hand,” and “to conclude” help readers identify the stages of the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and several ideas are joined in long, unclear sequences, particularly the sentence about salaries, housing, culture, and independence. Some linking phrases are mechanical or do not clearly show the relationship between ideas. The conclusion also does not bring both sides together. To improve, give each paragraph a clear central point, develop it in a logical order, and use linking words only where they accurately express the connection.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “professionals,” “salaries,” “independent,” “training,” and “new invention.” This gives you some means of expressing the main ideas. However, the range is limited, and frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word choices sometimes make the message difficult to follow, as in “oppent,” “ferlicity,” “chancu,” and “relational.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “working in abroad” and “repay back to their country.” Build a more accurate set of topic-specific expressions and check spelling carefully. For instance, use “employment benefits” for workplace advantages and “contribute to their home country” when describing professionals giving back.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt to connect ideas in longer sentences, for example with “because” and “while,” and the reader can generally identify your main position and reasons. However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and attempts at complex sentences are often faulty. Errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries occur frequently: “Education play,” “professionals should required,” and “they free to chose” all need grammatical correction. Capitalisation and punctuation are also inconsistent, including the lowercase sentence openings and run-on sequences. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them using subordinate clauses. For example: “Professionals should be required to work in the country where they received their training.”
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.