Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

A plethora of people believe that doctors and engineers should work in that country where they did their training . While other agrues that they are free to work wherever they want . In my perception , such professionals, should work in any country they wanted to . There are numerous reasons which support both views .

To commense with , to be a professionals ,such as docotor and engineer is not an easy task . Sometimes the country, which had offered training during the prepration years do not provide expected salary and recognition . These become main reasons to let professionals work in other countries . There are several job opportunities , international exposure , global level recognitions and many more also support the notion. For instance , CEO of the Google had done training from the India and by working in the USA , the company has been expanded all over the world .

On the flip slide ,it also affects the sentiments of a government , as lots of money is spent in providing trainings and if they work for another country then it will increase the economy of other country . For instance , the Indian cricketer Virat Kohli had shifted to the London along with family . Many people had criticized this fact, believing that leaving the country , which is responsible in providing fame is not valid.

To recapitulate , professionals should work in any part of the world as it helps to provide better career options , upgraded lifestyles, fame at global level,along with that it will help to broaden the horizons.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions and state your view clearly: “professionals should work in any country they wanted to.” The paragraph supporting freedom gives relevant reasons, including salary, recognition and international opportunities. However, some points are not fully explained or closely matched to the question. The Google example is unclear: it does not identify the professional or explain how the example supports the claim about training and migration. The Virat Kohli example concerns a cricketer rather than a doctor or engineer, so it offers limited support for the argument about professionals. Develop each side with a directly relevant example and explain the consequences more fully; this would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion that restates your opinion. Signposting such as “To commence with,” “On the flip side,” and “To recapitulate” helps readers follow the broad progression. However, some links are mechanical, and the relationship between ideas is not always clear. For example, the Google example follows a list of benefits without explaining which benefit it demonstrates, while the cricket example shifts away from the topic. The conclusion also lists advantages rather than drawing together the two sides. Use clearer links between each claim and its evidence, and make references explicit so the argument flows more naturally.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You show an adequate range and attempt some less common or formal expressions, including “international exposure,” “recognition,” and “broaden the horizons.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, although some are inaccurate or unnatural in context. “A plethora of people” is an awkward way to introduce a common belief, and “global level recognitions” is not a natural collocation. There are also spelling errors such as “agrues,” “commense,” and “prepration,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural phrasing rather than adding formality for its own sake, and proofread spelling. More accurate collocations would make your vocabulary more effective and flexible.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “the country, which had offered training” and a conditional structure beginning “if they work for another country.” Meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “to be a professionals” has an article and plural mismatch, and “the country … do not provide” has subject–verb disagreement. The opening also contains sentence fragments beginning “While other…,” and “In my perception, such professionals, should…” has unnecessary punctuation. Review agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, and check verb forms and tense consistency. Greater control of these patterns would make your varied sentences clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.