Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Each year the job market becomes more competetive and open for foreigners , this gives the opportunity for people from different backround to find a better life conditions , some people argue that professionals ,such as doctors and engenieers should only work in the very country they had their training in ,others believe that you should be have the option to work where you please , this essay will discuss both view,as i personnely believe that you have the right to work where you want to be.

For a country to thrive it needs their own people to be well educated and informed for it to build to its economy and transfer knowledge for the upcoming generation ,most countries gives free education and healthcare for the very purpose to educate the people for them to be a pillar in society and to then help state by innovtion and by the service they offer and with taxmoney where its all created locally this will boost the country reputation and help it be more prominent and culturally accepted for instance the ancient city of baghded even though it got destroyed its still to this very date as the cradle the delivered knowledge , medicine and poetry to world , so if country invest so much on its citizen offering the services the create so much debt for them just to share the knowledge somewhere elsefor that the country will eventually fall.

After grad school all students focus on building their careers and finding the position where they feel they can excel and climb the corprote ladder and find the suitable work environment and better opportinities , after spending all their time building their acadamic career for them just find low wages and long hours just for them to survive the month , yet the job market have become so saturated that you need more than college degree just to be accepted and at the start you have to settle with so little just so you can enjoy less hours with families ,most people now focus on just finding better opportunities in foreign land where they have better work conditions and living expenses that are affordable and yet huge demand from companies for example, germany offers a lot of positions for nurses doctors , the united states of america offers intership whith housing included and bevreges , in my point of view everyone is responsible for themselves if they find comfort is staying the their hometown they will do if not the have the freedom to choose other offers and chances to build a new life in the country the feel satisfied in .

In conclusion both parties serves a great view on how the professionals required to work and why, as i previously said i believe that in the end it comes to the person choice on how he wants to build his career and where.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both sides of the debate and state a clear view: “everyone is responsible for themselves” and professionals should be free to choose where to work. The first body paragraph explains why a country may expect a return on its investment in education, while the second gives reasons professionals may seek better pay and conditions abroad, supported by examples of Germany and the United States. This is relevant coverage of the task. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained: the claim that a country will “eventually fall” if trained workers leave needs a clearer link or qualification, and the examples of overseas opportunities are not developed in detail. Explain the consequences and support each main reason more precisely to make the discussion more balanced and convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion that restates your opinion. This gives the reader a broad sense of the argument’s direction. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because many separate points are joined into very long sentences. In the second body paragraph, for example, the discussion moves from career ambitions to low wages, family time, overseas demand, and country examples without clear breaks or links. Connectives such as “yet,” “so,” and “for instance” are used, but they do not always show the precise relationship between ideas. Divide the body paragraphs into shorter, focused sentences and use clear topic sentences and references to guide the reader.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “job market,” “build their careers,” “work conditions,” and “opportunities,” and some choices help communicate the main ideas. There is also an effort to use less common expressions such as “pillar in society” and “cradle” of knowledge. However, the range is not consistently controlled: spelling errors such as “competetive,” “engenieers,” and “opportinities,” along with awkward combinations such as “better life conditions” and “huge demand from companies,” sometimes make the reader pause. Some phrases are also imprecise, including “serves a great view.” Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations as complete phrases, rather than relying on approximate word combinations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “if they find comfort … they will do” and clauses explaining why countries educate professionals. This shows an effort to express relationships between ideas. However, long sentences often contain several grammatical problems, and these can make meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “some people argue … should only work …, others believe,” which needs clearer sentence boundaries, and “most countries gives,” where the subject and verb do not agree. There are also errors with articles, pronouns, and sentence construction, as in “the country they had their training in” and “the country the feel satisfied in.” Use shorter sentences, check subject–verb agreement and articles, and proofread punctuation so complex ideas remain clear.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.