Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often argued that tall apartment buildings should be constructed to accomodate more people in cities rather than building individual separate home. I strongly belive that constructing high rise building is a good approach because it saves extra land and provides all facilities in one place.

the main reason behind building high rise apartments is that it can save extra land which otherwise can be used for agriculture purposes. they reduce the need to expand cities to the surrounding farm lands. Small cities often have limited space so large number of people can be accomodated in relatively short area. Cost of living is also cheaper compared to indiviuals homes. People can buy flats in cheaper prices compared to expensive homes which help them to save extra money. For example, the bengkok city has accomodated their residents in tall building which helps to use extra land for other purposes.

The other reason behind my argument is that tall buildings provide better access to facilities. Apartments can be built near the schools, hospitals, workplace and shopping centers. This help everyone to navigate easily to their destination. Residents can save time and transportation cost. Individuals do not need personal vehicle to travel and this will make less air pollution. Shared facilities such as parking, lifts and security syatems can make urban living more convienent. It is also easier for authorites to manage people in small area rather than in qalonies. for example, in densely populated cities, high rise buildings allow people to live close to buisness districts.

in conclusion, residental apartment building is good technique to save extra land in small cities as it can accomodate hundreds of families in short space and provides good access to neccessary facilities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you strongly support tall apartment buildings, and both body paragraphs give relevant reasons—saving land and improving access to facilities. The examples of using land for agriculture and living near schools, hospitals and workplaces help explain your argument. However, some points are asserted rather than fully developed. For instance, the claim that apartment living is cheaper is not explained in detail, and the Bangkok example is brief and does not show specifically how the city’s buildings have freed land for other uses. To strengthen the response, develop each main point with a clearer cause-and-effect explanation or a more precise example, and briefly acknowledge any limitation of high-rise housing before reaffirming your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion that restates your view. The progression from land use to access to services is logical, and phrases such as “The other reason” help signal the shift. Cohesion is sometimes mechanical, however, because several sentences begin with “They,” “People,” or “Residents,” and the links between claims can be abrupt. For example, the move from cheaper flats to the Bangkok example would benefit from an explicit explanation of how the example supports affordability or land conservation. Use a wider range of linking expressions and make references such as “they” unmistakably clear to improve flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary for the topic, including “agriculture,” “transportation cost,” “shared facilities,” and “densely populated.” These choices communicate the main ideas, but some wording is imprecise or repetitive, such as “extra land,” “good approach,” and “provides good access.” There are also spelling errors, including “accomodate,” “belive,” “syatems,” and “neccessary,” which reduce accuracy. Some collocations need attention: “buy flats in cheaper prices” is not natural, and “individuals homes” is unclear. Build precision by learning common combinations such as “at a lower price,” “residential land,” and “access to essential services,” and proofread spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a relative clause in “land which otherwise can be used for agriculture purposes” and a conditional structure in “which otherwise can be used.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. Subject–verb agreement is incorrect in “This help everyone,” and the opening comparison, “rather than building individual separate home,” is not formed clearly. Articles and plurals also need attention, as in “in relatively short area” and “high rise building.” Capitalisation and sentence boundaries are inconsistent, with paragraphs beginning “the main reason” and “in conclusion.” Practise checking agreement, articles, and plural nouns, while varying sentence patterns without making comparisons awkward.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.