Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

City ares are one of the most important part of a country. Most of the residence live here with the hope of high living standard and better earnings. But nowadays providing enough living spaces for them have become huge challenge. In my perspective, tall apartment blocks are the easiest and most efficient ways to provide living spaces.

In recent times, people from residential areas prefer to move in cities. Reason behind that is uplifting income and standards. Most of the people think of it and for which, cities have become crowded. So housing for those people turned into a big mess. To solve it, multi floored houses play a major roll. Assuming, a 10 floor 4 unit building provides enough spaces for nearly 40 families to live. Meanwhile typical houses in that same area would have provided only 1 or 2 family to survive. Plus, every inch is an oppotunity of business in cities. So tall buildings are very good investment. It creates rental business opportunity for investores. It directly benefits economically to country.

But these blocks increase issues in busy areas as well. Sun light can't reach to most of the area. Massive number of trees are cut down for which, these creates environmental instability. Most of the buildings require excess spaces which make the roads very narrow. Plus these buildings leave very few spaces for outdoor games. Children can't play in their leisure period. Most of them spend their free hours on social media. Additionally, health problem raises among most of the residence.

However, government has strict rules for these big cities. For example: mandatory institutions(school, medical, playground,mosque, etc.), large roads, traffic controll system and so on. This helps to improve the situation. So, it outweighs the disadvantages of having tall apartment blocks to ensure sufficient number of homes in large cities.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you consider tall apartment blocks an efficient way to provide homes, and the conclusion reinforces this view. You address both the benefits and drawbacks, supporting the benefits with the example of a ten-floor building accommodating around 40 families and noting possible rental income. This is relevant and gives the argument some development. However, some points are less fully explained: the claims about reduced sunlight, tree loss, narrow roads and children’s health are listed quickly, and the final reference to government rules does not explain how these measures specifically resolve the problems. To strengthen the response, develop fewer points with clearer cause-and-effect reasoning and make the comparison with other housing approaches more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall structure: it introduces your position, presents advantages, considers disadvantages, and ends with a conclusion. Paragraphing helps the reader follow this progression, and signposts such as “But,” “Meanwhile,” and “However” show the relationship between sections. Some connections are less clear or feel mechanical, particularly “Assuming” before the building example and “So, it outweighs the disadvantages,” where the reference of “it” is not precise. The disadvantages paragraph also moves rapidly from sunlight and trees to roads, recreation and health without showing how these points relate. Use clearer links between claims and explanations, and refer explicitly to the idea or measure you mean rather than relying on vague pronouns.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “multi floored houses,” “rental business opportunity,” “environmental instability,” and “mandatory institutions.” These choices show an attempt to discuss housing, urban growth and its effects. However, inaccurate word forms, spelling and collocations are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “residence” is used where “residents” is needed, “roll” for “role,” and “oppotunity” and “investores” are misspelled. Phrases such as “living spaces,” “big mess,” and “very good investment” are also broad or informal for this argument. Aim for more precise combinations, such as “housing shortage,” “high-density development,” and “a viable investment,” while checking spelling and word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including cause-and-effect structures such as “Most of the buildings require excess spaces which make the roads very narrow” and a conditional example about a ten-floor building. The main argument remains understandable, but errors in agreement, articles, plurals and sentence construction recur. For example, “providing enough living spaces for them have become” needs a singular verb, while “these creates environmental instability” has a mismatch between subject and verb. “Most of the residence” also needs a plural form, and the opening sentence has problems with number agreement. Review subject–verb agreement and noun forms, and build complex sentences around one clearly controlled main clause. More accurate sentence patterns would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.