Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays many peoples moves to cities for good education, healthcare and for works as a result the demand of houses is increasing.Therefore Individuals believe that they should build tall apartments blocks to provide enough homes inlarge cities.I am highly agree with these opnions because tall buildings can save many space and acoomodate many families therefore it has some disadvantages too we will discuss about both below.

The main advantage of tall apartments blocks is that they allow more people to live in small area as land areas in cities are limited and expensive to build separate houses for each families is not always practical.For example tall apartments can provide homes to mutiple families in a cheaper price than land houses. This reduce pressure of housing and help people to live closer to their works, schools and hospitals as a result individuals can spend less time travelling as a result peoples can spend more time with their childrens and families.Another advantage is that they can live together and make friends as a consequence they can live happily with their friends and families.

Therefore it has some disadvantages too such as fire and emergency risks.Fire rescue equipment often reaches up to lower floors and mid floors and take time to reach higher floors.Furthermore natural disasters is also a big problem taller structures experience higher sway during earthquake and strong winds.Power failure is also a problem when electricity fails elevatore stop working forcing residents to walk up or down on dozens of stairs.

In a conclusion,building tall apartment blocks in cities has many advantages and disadvanatges but in my opinion tall building should be build in cities because it provides homes to many families in smaller area than land area.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you strongly support tall apartment blocks, and you address both their benefits and drawbacks. The points about making better use of limited urban land and locating residents near work, schools, and hospitals are relevant and supported with examples. You also identify fire, earthquake, wind, and power-failure risks, so the response covers more than one side of the issue. This meets the task well, though some ideas are developed more fully than others: the housing and travel benefits receive explanation, while the point about residents making friends is asserted rather than demonstrated. To strengthen the response further, explain why high-rise construction is the best solution compared with alternatives such as renovating existing buildings or building on city outskirts.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on advantages, one on disadvantages, and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow your main position. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes weakened by mechanical or repeated linking. For example, “as a result” appears twice in close succession in the advantages paragraph, and “therefore” introduces both the opening and the disadvantages paragraph without a clear logical relationship. Some references are also unclear, as in “Therefore it has some disadvantages too,” where “it” could refer to the building approach or the preceding benefits. Use fewer, more precise transitions and make the relationship between each supporting point explicit. A clearer topic sentence for each body paragraph would also improve the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “demand,” “limited,” “pressure of housing,” “emergency risks,” and “natural disasters.” These choices show an attempt to discuss housing and urban safety beyond very basic terms. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the phrasing less natural, such as “opnions,” “acoomodate,” “mutiple,” and “land houses.” Some combinations are also awkward, including “in a cheaper price” and “taller structures experience higher sway.” Aim to learn accurate collocations as complete phrases, such as “at a lower cost” and “sway more during earthquakes.” More precise vocabulary for comparing housing solutions would help you express your argument with greater flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including explanations with “as” and “when,” and the main ideas are generally understandable. However, errors in sentence structure and grammatical control are frequent enough to make some sentences difficult to read. Examples include “many peoples moves,” “I am highly agree,” and “tall building should be build,” which show problems with agreement, verb forms, and sentence patterns. There are also issues with articles and plurals, as in “for each families,” and punctuation often fails to separate complete ideas, particularly in the long sentence beginning “This reduce pressure.” Practise building accurate sentences first, then combine them using subordinate clauses. Check subject–verb agreement, verb forms, and sentence boundaries during editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.