Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, people argue that the construction of tall apartment blocks is the best way to create enough homes to facilitate the citizens in better way.This is because urban populations are growing rapidly. I believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

On the one hand, providing tall apartments blocks is the new development in the big cities. Joint family system creates conflict between the families, these apartment blocks are giving enough space to live near their family without any conflicts. Furthermore, they give privacy. For instance, people from other small cities and rural areas move to big cities like Karachi for higher studies, in this way they will not face any expensive home issue because tall apartment blocks are the convenient and cheaper option for them. High-rise buildings are like mini city, people can facilitate theirselves with everything like shopping center, mini mart, mosques and schools near their residence.

On the other hand, high-rise buildings also has some drawbacks. Firstly, having too many people in one small area, leading to heavy traffic jams and crowded streets. Secondly, safety is a major concerns, in case of emergencies like fires and earhquckes crowded areas are difficult to handle.

In conclusion, the drawbacks of this development are manageable, although high-rise apartments can cause overcrowding and safety concerns, but cities with tall buildings have several number of benefits like family privacy, basic facilities for living and other institutions like mosques, schools are on walking distance. Therefore, I believe the advantages of tall appartment blocks outweigh the disadvantages.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you support tall apartment blocks, and the conclusion restates this view. You address both the benefits and drawbacks, with relevant points about privacy, nearby facilities, traffic and emergency safety. The Karachi example also helps illustrate why high-rise housing may suit students moving to cities. However, the response does not fully focus on whether this is the best way to provide enough homes: some discussion, such as family privacy and mosques, is not directly linked to housing capacity. The drawbacks are identified but not explored, and the claim that advantages outweigh them would be more convincing with a direct comparison or a specific explanation of how high-rise construction accommodates more residents.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, contrasting body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from benefits to drawbacks is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, the linking is sometimes mechanical, and the relationship between points is not always developed: the example about students and affordable homes could be connected more explicitly to the central issue of housing supply. The final paragraph repeats several earlier benefits rather than synthesising the comparison. Use clearer referencing and explain how each example supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “urban populations,” “high-rise buildings,” “privacy,” “overcrowding” and “safety concerns.” These choices make the main ideas understandable, and there are attempts at less common phrasing such as “mini city.” However, noticeable word-choice, collocation and spelling problems limit precision: “facilitate the citizens,” “expensive home issue,” and “several number of benefits” are unnatural, while “appartment” and “earhquckes” are misspelled. Some wording is also repetitive, particularly “tall apartment blocks” and “high-rise buildings.” Aim for accurate collocations and check spelling; a more precise vocabulary range would make your argument sound more natural and controlled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause (“This is because urban populations are growing rapidly”) and a conditional example (“in case of emergencies like fires…”). The overall meaning is generally clear, but some errors in agreement, sentence construction, articles and punctuation remain. For example, “high-rise buildings also has” should use a plural verb, and “a major concerns” has a mismatch between article and noun. The opening has a missing space after the full stop, while “Firstly, having too many people in one small area, leading to…” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence. Practise checking subject–verb agreement and ensure each sentence has a complete main clause. More accurate complex sentences would strengthen control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.