Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Nowadays, number of people are migrating from rural areas to urban areas. Due to this immigration in the large cities, demands for accomodation is increasing day by day. It is widely argue that construction of high-raised buildings is the essential way to fulfill this demand. I believe that, this is not relevent solution due to multiple reasons. So, i disagree with given statement. My poitviews are described in the ensuing paragraphs.
To commence, residency in the tall apprtment resist children freedom. To be more precise, children always locked into small home. They are not getting open area for thire outdoor games or outdoor activities. additionally, parents also do not allow them due to accidents such as fall from highest floor or stuked into lift. So, they always become engage with digital gadgets and not fascinated by other activities. They become less physically active and believe that going outside is a waste of energy and time. Moreover, after paying lot of money, people do not get spacious rooms in the tall apprtment blocks. They manage multiple works in the single room. For instance, my friend who is living in the appartment of Mumbai. He always doing his homework,cooking, attend guest and many more work in the same room. He also dry his cloths in the same area.
Despite of this, living in the tall appartment blocks may compromise privacy.Due to unavailibility of multiple rooms, indivisual use balcony for confidential purpose. Any secret thing of particular home is also not protected. owning to this, homes are close to each other. For example, if any conflict occure in the one family,which is family matter. However, the matter spread with the speed of light with other addition which is not fact. Therefore, family members have to give explanatons.
To encapsulate, building of highest appartment is not the solution of providing enough homes. It affects freedom of children and privacy. People also force to manage in the small resiential area with high cost.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
Your position is clear: you disagree that tall apartment blocks are the best solution, and you give relevant reasons concerning children’s activities, limited space, cost and privacy. The example about your friend in Mumbai also helps illustrate how one room may serve several purposes. However, the response addresses the proposal only partially because it mainly describes disadvantages of apartment living rather than explaining what other approaches could provide enough homes in large cities. Some claims, such as children being “always locked” indoors and family matters spreading quickly, are broad and not fully explained. To strengthen the response, develop fewer points with clearer reasoning and examples, and directly compare tall blocks with alternatives such as building outward or improving public transport to nearby areas.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the reader can follow the main line of disagreement. Paragraphs generally group related points: the first discusses children and space, while the second focuses on privacy. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several claims are added without clear links, and connectors such as “To commence,” “Moreover,” and “Despite of this” can feel mechanical or do not accurately signal the relationship between ideas. The privacy example, in particular, is hard to connect to the claim about apartment blocks. Use clearer topic sentences, explain how each example supports its point, and make transitions reflect the actual contrast or addition.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “accommodation,” “outdoor activities,” “privacy,” and “residential area,” and you attempt more specific expressions such as “compromise privacy.” However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make parts of the message difficult to understand, for example “children freedom,” “resist children,” and “secret thing.” Spelling errors such as “appartment,” “unavailibility,” and “explanatons” are also noticeable. These issues sometimes obscure your intended meaning, even though the overall topic remains clear. Build a bank of accurate housing-related phrases and check spelling; prefer natural combinations such as “restrict children’s freedom,” “lack of privacy,” and “limited living space.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including cause-and-effect structures with “Due to” and “So,” and a conditional example beginning “if any conflict…”. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in sentence structure, agreement, articles and verb forms. Examples include “number of people are migrating,” “demands for accomodation is increasing,” and “He always doing his homework.” Some sentences are also incomplete or awkwardly joined, as in “For example, if any conflict occure in the one family, which is family matter.” These errors can make the reader pause to interpret your meaning. Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then add complex clauses, checking subject–verb agreement, articles and complete sentence structure.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.