Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Tall apartment blocks plays a vital role in accomodation crisis particularly in large cities where population is immense. I agree that the only way to provide enough accomodation in large cities is to build tall apartments.

Most of the time the population in large cities is immense and growing over the period, which makes harder for the city to provide enough accomodation to all the people, building tall apartment blocks solves the house crisis issues alot because in a home only 4 to 6 people can live approximately but if we compared it to tall apartment blocks where 16 to 40 people can live if it had 5 to 10 flats and the numbers can grow more depending on the flats. Additionally, tall apartments provide a better view of the city from the balcony compared to homes. Tall apartments generally have bigger car parks in underground as comapred to homes where you can have lots of issues in parking more than one car.

However, some of the people prefer homes because it has a backyard where you can spend some time in nature. A garden where you can plant some trees which gives quite a good look to the house. In the house there's no noises because it is not over populated as compared to apartments where alot of people lives. In the end i will agree that tall apartment blocks is the best way to provide enough homes in large cities as it has more benefits comapred to houses.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you agree that tall apartment blocks are the best way to provide homes, and you give relevant reasons, including accommodating more residents and providing parking. You also acknowledge an opposing view about gardens and noise, so the response addresses both sides of the question. However, the support is limited: the comparison of how many people can live in a house or block is asserted rather than explained with a specific example, and the view and parking points do not strongly establish that high-rise construction is the best solution. The response is 240 words, below the 250-word minimum; the 10 words copied from the task prompt were not counted. Develop your main reasons further and explain why alternatives are less effective.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting apartment blocks, a paragraph presenting disadvantages of houses, and a concluding statement. Connectors such as “Additionally” and “However” help signal the relationship between points. However, the progression within the main paragraph is uneven: the discussion moves from population capacity to views and parking without showing how each point supports the central argument. Some linking is also repetitive or mechanical, particularly the repeated comparisons with homes and the final “In the end.” Group related reasons, use clearer references, and make the opposing paragraph lead back to your position rather than simply listing preferences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “population,” “backyard,” “balcony,” and “underground” parking, and the reader can generally understand your meaning. However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, especially “tall apartment blocks,” “homes,” and “immense.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-choice problems, such as “accomodation,” “alot,” and “comapred,” as well as unnatural combinations like “house crisis issues” and “bigger car parks in underground.” These reduce precision and fluency. Build a wider set of accurate terms for housing and urban planning, and check spelling and collocations carefully; for example, use “housing shortage” and “underground car parks.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer sentences and use clauses to explain causes and comparisons, but the range is limited and complex sentences are often faulty. Agreement errors occur in “Tall apartment blocks plays” and “a lot of people lives,” while “which makes harder” is missing a subject or object structure. The sentence beginning “Most of the time…” becomes difficult to follow because several ideas are joined together without clear sentence boundaries. There are also errors in articles and number, such as “in a home only 4 to 6 people can live,” and punctuation and capitalisation problems, including lowercase “i.” Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and divide long sentences into clearer units.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.