Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It has been argued that the appropriate method to supply sufficient houses in big cities is by constructing high-rise residential complexes. I partially agree with this view as large appartments may accomodate big families however, these buildings may not be suitable for all households. The objective of this essay is to justify my opinion with some relevant examples.

On the one hand, discussing the benefits of tall residential blocks is they shelter large number of families under one roof within small flats. This trend will free up some land space that can be used for other recreational activities or other projects by government. For example, single apartment complex can provide home to many families but if they opt for seperate house it will not require sufficient space to built in alongwith they will have to face hmaximum construction costs. Therefore, it is favourable for them to choose living in flats.

On the other hand, residing in multi-storey housing may cause a significant issue to residents dwelling there. It is privacy as, pupils live at one place though they have seperate blocks to live in but their private life is on risk. Along with personal life some obstacles like parking, water availability hurdles may be a serious concern towards them. For instance, the surged inclination of shifting to the flats resuls in dense population over that area which may consequently lead to declined parking spaces. In addition, expanded citizens demands more water supply which consequently leads to possiblity of water shortage.

In conclusion, I will concede that although the construction of tall housing flats have some favourable outcomes in terms of cities progress but its drawbacks should not be ignored. For this reason, government should be working on other housing schemes too life building afforable houses in suburban areas to create sustainable urabn communities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you partially agree, recognising that high-rise blocks can house many families while arguing they are not suitable for everyone. You address both advantages and disadvantages, and the conclusion proposes suburban housing as an additional approach. The points about freeing land and pressure on parking and water are relevant, but some are not fully explained. For example, the claim that residents’ privacy is at risk is difficult to follow because the essay does not explain how apartment living causes this. The example about separate houses and construction costs also needs a clearer comparison. Develop each main point with a specific explanation or example, and make the link between your evidence and your position more explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs and a conclusion. The progression from benefits to drawbacks is easy to recognise, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, several links are mechanical or unclear. For instance, “It is privacy as” does not connect smoothly to the preceding sentence, and “Along with personal life” does not clearly introduce the practical concerns that follow. Use transitions that express the precise relationship between ideas, and ensure pronouns and references clearly identify what they refer to.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “high-rise residential complexes,” “recreational activities,” “dense population” and “sustainable urban communities.” These choices show an effort to use language beyond basic terms. However, inaccurate word choice, collocation and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make ideas harder to understand. Examples include “shelter large number of families,” “surged inclination,” “expanded citizens demands” and “declined parking spaces”; these are not natural combinations in this context. There are also spelling errors such as “appartments,” “seperate” and “afforable.” Aim for precise, natural phrases and check spelling carefully. Reusing straightforward, accurate wording is more effective than choosing an ambitious expression that does not fit.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in “although the construction of tall housing flats have some favourable outcomes” and a conditional comparison beginning “if they opt for separate house.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main ideas are generally understandable. Some errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles and punctuation remain. For example, “a significant issue … It is privacy as” creates an incomplete, awkward sentence, while “the construction … have” has a subject–verb agreement problem. The opening sentence of the first body paragraph is also difficult to parse. Work on building complete sentences around one clear main clause, and check agreement and article use when editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.