Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The statement illustrates, that by providing enough shelter for peoples in large cities is to build tall apartments blocks. i am agree with the statement because, they occupy less land while providing more accomodation within a limited space.

To begin with, as large cities have more tall buildings that provide space for more people to live as compared to detached or independent huses. In urban areas, where every facility is available from hospital to shoipping and jobs oppertunities, so for that reason having an independent house is more expensive due to the availability of these facailties.

Furthermore, they accomodate a large number of family in a small area and make efficent use of limited space in crowded cities. Which obviously, reduced pressure on the demand of residential land.

In conclusion, i strongly agree that constructing tall apartments blocks in big cities is the efficent way to provide more space for living of peoples. In major cities, the need of houses is often high so constructing more apartments can solved the problem of diificent living spaces. It's the best way of utilisation of land efficently.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you agree that tall apartment blocks can help provide homes, and you give relevant reasons, including using less land and accommodating more families in crowded cities. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are asserted rather than explained with specific examples or fuller reasoning. The comparison with independent houses is introduced, but the link between city facilities and the housing solution remains unclear. The conclusion repeats your view without adding support. The response is also below the required 250 words, so there is limited space to develop your argument. Extend each main point with an explanation and a relevant example, such as how a high-rise development could house more residents on a particular urban site.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and the ideas generally relate to the topic. You use basic signposting such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore” and “In conclusion.” However, progression between ideas is limited, and some links are unclear. For example, the sentence about facilities, jobs and the expense of independent houses does not clearly explain how this supports building apartments. The fragment beginning “Which obviously” is not smoothly connected to the preceding sentence, while “so for that reason” is repetitive. Develop a clearer sequence within each paragraph: state one reason, explain its effect, and then give an example. Use referencing and linking words only where they clarify the relationship between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “limited space,” “residential land,” “crowded cities” and “demand,” which helps communicate your main argument. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less clear or natural. Examples include “accomodation,” “huses,” “shoipping,” “oppertunities,” “facailties” and “diificent.” Some phrases are also awkward, such as “space for living of peoples” and “the efficient way to provide more space for living.” Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, and avoid repeating “space” and “provide.” Building a small set of precise terms for housing density, urban land use and affordability would help you express your ideas more clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, but the range is limited and errors occur frequently, sometimes making relationships between ideas difficult to follow. For example, “i am agree” has an incorrect verb pattern, and “as large cities have more tall buildings that provide space” is an awkwardly constructed clause. “Which obviously, reduced pressure” is a sentence fragment with an incorrect verb form, while “constructing more apartments can solved” uses the wrong form after “can.” Capitalisation and punctuation also need attention, including lowercase “i” and commas that interrupt phrases. Practise forming complete sentences and checking subject–verb agreement, verb patterns after modal verbs, and clause boundaries. These corrections will make your argument easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.