Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The better way to increase in number of homes in big cities is to build tall apartment blocks in cities and its very useful way to provide home. This technique is beneficial because many homes are built in a single land rather than many lands and we talk about why its important for us to build tall apartment. but to some extent.

People move from villages to cities for better life, healthy lifestyles, good education and better future. This cause issue to cities and there is shortage of land in cities .The only solution to solve this problem is to built taller apartments. Moreover, less land is required to build apartments . On the other hand if homes will built for every family then no much land is available and to built homes people cut down the tress which cause deforestation and cause an increase ion temperature. People feel safe in apartment because proper security staff and CCTV cameras are available.

It is useful to some extent because some private authorities build taller apartment without examine the area and its very dangerous if earthquake occur. Earthquake shakes the building and cause distruction . That's why, authorities have to examine the area first and then started work on the project. We cannot rely only on this source , governments shouldn make housing scheme programs for the residents of cities and villages and allocate a budget for this program. Government should give loan to people so people can build their own house .

In conclusion, its a better choice to build taller apartments to provide homes in large cities but we cannot rely only on this source . We should find better way to provide homes to resident of cities .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing the benefits and drawbacks of tall apartment blocks. However, the development of ideas is somewhat uneven. While you mention land efficiency and safety, the argument regarding earthquakes is a bit tangential and lacks a clear link to the overall housing strategy. The position is clear, but the conclusion is slightly repetitive and does not fully synthesize the arguments presented. To reach a higher band, ensure that each paragraph focuses on a single, well-developed point that directly supports your stance on whether this is the 'best' way to provide housing.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or repetitive (e.g., 'Moreover', 'On the other hand', 'In conclusion'). There are instances where the logical flow between sentences is disrupted by awkward phrasing, such as the transition between the benefits of apartments and the risks of earthquakes. Referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult to track the subject matter. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that each sentence logically follows the previous one will significantly enhance the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for higher bands. You rely on basic terms like 'better way', 'good', and 'big', which limits the sophistication of your argument. There are also some noticeable errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'without examine the area' (should be 'without examining') and 'cause distruction' (spelling error). To improve, try to incorporate more topic-specific vocabulary related to urban planning, such as 'high-density housing', 'infrastructure', or 'sustainable development', and pay closer attention to word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'governments shouldn make'), article usage (e.g., 'in single land'), and tense consistency. Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma placement. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Focusing on basic sentence construction and proofreading for common errors like pluralization and verb forms will help improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.