Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is argued that one of the best way to provide enough housing in metropolises is to build high-rise apartments. I completely agree with this statement because such buildings can accommodate a large number of families, reducing the need for extensive housing construction and allow government to use that saved budgets on other modern facilities for the residents

One of the major advantages of tall apartment blocks is that these have the capacity to accommodate larger number of families compared to other building types making better usage of scarce urban lands while reducing the need to build more residential areas in different parts of a city which are already crowded. As a result, it reduces environmental pollution cased by construction sites too. Moreover, if a city has only residential areas to reduce housing crisis, it would lose its green spaces and other facilities subsequently and thus such high-rise buildings are a great solution. A classic example would be Singapore, where such building structures are very common and seen as an effective way to turn their land scarcity into something creative while using other spaces for different projects helping citizens ultimately.

Another positive impact is that, governments can invest the remaining money kept for extra housing construction on modern facilities, public transportation instead to improve the citizen's quality of life. The state would be able to install new technologies, build more parks and green spaces, better traffic system and so on. This would significantly improve the standard of life in such areas as government would be able to improve other aspects of life rather than focusing only on one issue at a time. For instance, Singapore enables residents to use MRT systems that help them commute easily, avoiding traffic congestions. Furthermore, they invest heavily on green spaces and parks for the people. While it increases their quality of life, government also reduces housing crisis by building tall apartments.

In conclusion, i strongly believe that building high rise residential areas will help large cities with enough accommodations as its capacity to house large number of families reduce unnecessary constructions of houses everywhere while helping government to spend the remaining budget of other required facilities and amenities instead.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the prompt clearly and maintains a consistent position throughout. You have provided relevant arguments regarding land efficiency and the reallocation of government resources. The ideas are extended with a specific example (Singapore), which strengthens the argument. However, the development could be more nuanced; for instance, you could briefly acknowledge potential drawbacks of high-rise living to provide a more balanced perspective, which would elevate the response to a higher band. Overall, the task is fully addressed with a clear, logical flow of ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a central theme, and you use cohesive devices such as 'Moreover,' 'Another positive impact,' and 'For instance' to link ideas. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical, and there are minor issues with referencing (e.g., 'as government would be able to improve other aspects of life'—the reference to 'the government' is slightly repetitive). Paragraphing is used effectively to separate distinct arguments, ensuring the reader can follow your line of reasoning without difficulty.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to discuss the topic with some precision, using terms like 'metropolises,' 'land scarcity,' and 'amenities.' There are some minor errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'cased by' (caused by) and 'saved budgets' (budget savings). While you attempt to use less common vocabulary, the phrasing is occasionally slightly unnatural. Nevertheless, the vocabulary is adequate to convey your meaning clearly, and the errors do not impede communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical slips, such as 'one of the best way' (should be 'ways'), 'allow government to use' (should be 'allows the government'), and 'cased by' (spelling error). Additionally, some sentences are slightly run-on or lack necessary articles (e.g., 'on modern facilities, public transportation instead'). While these errors are noticeable, they do not prevent the reader from understanding your argument. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the consistent use of articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.