Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In a fast changing world, population will escalate rapidly. soaring population requires more homes, So it will leads to build additional residence in large cities. yes, no doubt that best method to give enough homes in big cities is to build sky high apartments blocks.

First of all ,builders most prefer tall apartments because it requires less area of land. So it will leads to minimum cost , and make budget friendly homes. Than they sale these apartments at high profit margin.

The governments also most likely to provide home as a tall buildings or apartments , large cities contains more families and individuals. due to , extra facilities. to avoid lack of residence in country, government likely most tall apartments.

Apartments can be close to workplace, schools, hospitals and public transport. this can reduce long distance commuting and traffic. Land in large area is limited. Building houses separately requires a lot of space. A tall building can provided hundred of homes o a separate piece of land. Water and sewage system can serve many households in one area

If cities build upwards , they do not need to expand as much outward. this can protect farmland. more open spaces can remain available for recreation.

In conclusion, towering apartments in large cities , look very attractive as compare to flat blocks. So this would create positively impact on tourism. Enhance the city appearance, make the city more appealing, add to the city aesthetic appeal, one of the real example is Dubai.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of tall apartment blocks. While the main ideas—such as land efficiency, proximity to services, and environmental benefits—are relevant, they are often presented in a list-like fashion rather than being fully developed with detailed explanation or evidence. For instance, the point about tourism in the conclusion is a new, underdeveloped idea that lacks a logical connection to the main argument about housing needs. The response covers all parts of the task, but the depth of analysis is limited, keeping it at a Band 5.5 level.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the progression of ideas is sometimes disjointed. While there is an attempt to use cohesive devices (e.g., 'First of all', 'In conclusion'), they are often used mechanically or incorrectly, such as the awkward transition 'due to , extra facilities'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the internal structure of paragraphs lacks strong logical flow. The punctuation errors, particularly the misuse of commas and capitalization, further disrupt the readability of the text. Overall, the organization is present but lacks the flexibility and precision required for a higher band.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety expected at higher levels. There is a reliance on basic terms like 'big', 'tall', and 'good', and some word choices are unnatural or incorrect, such as 'soaring population requires more homes, So it will leads to build additional residence'. The student attempts to use more academic vocabulary in the conclusion, but the phrasing 'create positively impact' is grammatically incorrect. To improve, the student should focus on collocations and more sophisticated synonyms for common words.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. There are consistent issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'it will leads to'), article usage, and sentence structure. Many sentences are simple or contain errors in complex construction, such as 'The governments also most likely to provide home as a tall buildings'. Punctuation is also a significant issue, with erratic comma placement and missing full stops. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors across basic and complex structures limits the score to a 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.