Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
In recent years, building tall apartment blocks has become a matter of considerable debate. While some people argue that building tall apartment blocks is unnecessary to provide enough homes in large cities, I firmly agree with the view that building tall apartment blocks play an essential role in providing homes in urban areas. I believe this position is justified because saving land and improving infastructure are particularly significant factors that should be taken into consideration.
The primary reason why I hold this view is that tall apartment blocks can save land for nature and create a peaceful environment. In other words, housing societies and communities are continuously increasing in large cities, which is putting consistently preasure on natural beauth and the environment. As a result, climate change and other environmental problems are becoming increasingly serious. For instance, deforstation is a common issue in many developing countris, where people cut down trees for their short term benefits, and to build societies there. Because of that, natural land is decreasing day by day. Therefore, building tall apartment blocks could be a great initiative to save land and other natural resources.
Another compelling reason is that tall apartment blocks can provide better infrastructure and improve the quality of life. One major factor behind this is that the population of large cities is rapidly increasing, and the basic neccesities of life are also increasing such as water and electricity. Thus, tall apartment blocks can help cities manage these needs more efficiently and prevent people from isolation.
In conclusion, tall apartment blocks provide many useful benefits to societies and communities. Apart from that, they help protect natural beauty and other natural resources for agricultural crops and trees. So, I truly believe that large cities should encourage the construction of tall apartment blocks.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0
The response addresses the prompt clearly, maintaining a consistent position throughout. The arguments regarding land conservation and infrastructure efficiency are relevant and logically extended. However, the development is somewhat general; for instance, the link between tall buildings and preventing 'isolation' is asserted but not fully explained or supported with concrete detail. While the ideas are relevant, they could be more deeply explored to reach a higher band. The response covers all parts of the task effectively, providing a clear stance and supporting reasons, which aligns well with the requirements for a Band 7.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0
The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. Cohesive devices such as 'The primary reason', 'In other words', and 'Another compelling reason' are used to guide the reader through the argument. However, the flow is occasionally slightly mechanical, and some transitions could be more sophisticated. Referencing is generally clear, and the progression of ideas is logical, meeting the criteria for a Band 7 score.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is sufficient for the task, allowing for some flexibility. The student uses relevant topic-specific terms like 'urban areas', 'infrastructure', and 'natural resources'. However, there are several spelling errors ('infastructure', 'preasure', 'beauth', 'deforstation', 'countris', 'neccesities') which are noticeable. While these errors do not impede communication, they demonstrate a lack of control over less common lexical items. To improve, the student should focus on accuracy in spelling and collocation to move beyond the Band 6 level.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There is an attempt at complex sentences, such as 'While some people argue that... I firmly agree that...', which is handled well. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('building tall apartment blocks play' instead of 'plays') and minor punctuation or article usage slips. While these errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the message, they occur frequently enough to limit the score to a Band 6.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.