Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

[1:42 pm, 20/08/2026] ABN Prep Rawalpindi Located at Lower Ground Kohistan Towers Saddar Rwp.: https://ieltsliz.com/ielts-writing-task-2/

[2:37 pm, 20/08/2026] Aqsa Student: In cities, the population is increasing day by day. Providing homes to the increased growth is the greatest challenge for government. The vertical structure buildings provided the best way to give the living space to each person within reasonable cost. While, the families who wanted the privacy, demands the separate house, accommodation can given to only fewer people. So I agree with the concept of long buildings that are consisted on greatest number of apartment.

To begin with private homes, local communities are filled with large and small houses, where they are spending their whole life. Homes are surrounded by attractive garden filled with grass, birds, insects, fountains, glossy and shinny flowers that are providing the health benefits to the children, elderly people. But in these living societies, marts , hospitals, schools, parks are apart from houses. Long drives needed to reached at specific area. People who get injured during any curricular activity, they will not access the facilities from hospital on exact time, and may cause serious damage to someone's health.

On the other side, inside the vertical largest building, separate area like laundry area, small clinics, tuck shops, parking areas, emergency staff for any accident are specified before building's construction. The architectural map is made under the observation of the experts. Single building supplies large benefits to greatest number of people. It may have same undesirable facts like some people faces the lift related issues, many of them do not interested in social interactions. Gardens are not available for personal used like available in private homes, buildings are not strong enough to stand during natural disasters.

In conclusion, every sectors have its pros and cons. but I strongly agree with the development of long-heighted building. When we made them a large space is left behind and that land is used for more commercial purposes. Libraries, Schools, Welfare-Centers, and many other organization will be constructed and it is beneficial for the local citizens who migrated or who already living here.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses the task, arguing in favor of tall apartment blocks with some exploration of both benefits and drawbacks. However, the argument could be clearer and more directly connected to the question prompt. The assertion that high buildings can accommodate more people is mentioned, but some points, such as the discussion of private homes, seem somewhat tangential and weaken the central argument. A more focused approach would enhance clarity and coherence. Overall, there is a clear stance taken, but further development is needed to maximize impact on the argument. Score: 6.5

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The coherence and cohesion of the response show signs of development but require improvement. Ideas are presented in a structured way, with a clear introduction and conclusion. However, transitions between ideas could be stronger; for example, the connection between the first and subsequent paragraphs feels weak. The excessive detail on the disadvantages of private homes, though relevant, distracts from the focus on tall buildings. Utilizing better linking phrases would enhance the flow. Overall, while the structure is satisfactory, clearer connections between points are crucial. Score: 6.0

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The lexical resource demonstrates the ability to employ a variety of terms related to the topic, such as "vertical structure buildings" and "architectural map." Nonetheless, some word choices are awkward, such as "greatest challenge for government" and "long-heighted building," which do not convey meaning effectively and impact overall clarity. The occasional inaccuracies in word forms and awkward constructions diminish the sophistication of the language. A broader range of vocabulary and more precise word choices would enhance the effectiveness of the writing. Score: 6.0

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The grammatical range includes a mix of sentence structures, some of which are correctly formed, but errors occur throughout the text. For example, "accommodation can given" should be "accommodation can be given" and "marts" is an inappropriate term here. There are several punctuation issues, including missing commas and run-on sentences that obscure the meaning. Overall, while the writer demonstrates some grammatical proficiency, the errors periodically hinder communication, necessitating greater accuracy. Score: 5.5

Overall feedback

Your response presents a thoughtful perspective on the topic with some relevant points. However, to enhance your score, focus on ensuring that all ideas directly support your main argument regarding tall buildings. Strengthen transitions between paragraphs to improve cohesion. Additionally, work on refining your vocabulary; using more precise terms will significantly impact clarity. Pay attention to grammatical accuracy, as this will help communicate your ideas more effectively. Regular practice in writing and self-review will aid in addressing these areas. Overall Estimated Band Score: 6.0

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.