Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-20
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In cities, the population is increasing day by day. Providing homes to the increased growth is the greatest challenge for government. The vertical structure buildings provided the best way to give the living space to each person within reasonable cost. While, the families who wanted the privacy, demands the separate house, accommodation can given to only fewer people. So I agree with the concept of long buildings that are consisted on greatest number of apartment.
To begin with private homes, local communities are filled with large and small houses, where they are spending their whole life. Homes are surrounded by attractive garden filled with grass, birds, insects, fountains, glossy and shinny flowers that are providing the health benefits to the children, elderly people. But in these living societies, marts , hospitals, schools, parks are apart from houses. Long drives needed to reached at specific area. People who get injured during any curricular activity, they will not access the facilities from hospital on exact time, and may cause serious damage to someone's health.
On the other side, inside the vertical largest building, separate area like laundry area, small clinics, tuck shops, parking areas, emergency staff for any accident are specified before building's construction. The architectural map is made under the observation of the experts. Single building supplies large benefits to greatest number of people. It may have same undesirable facts like some people faces the lift related issues, many of them do not interested in social interactions. Gardens are not available for personal used like available in private homes, buildings are not strong enough to stand during natural disasters.
In conclusion, every sectors have its pros and cons. but I strongly agree with the development of long-heighted building. When we made them a large space is left behind and that land is used for more commercial purposes. Libraries, Schools, Welfare-Centers, and many other organization will be constructed and it is beneficial for the local citizens who migrated or who already living here.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the task by discussing the benefits and drawbacks of building tall apartment blocks in urban areas. The student clearly states their agreement with the proposal, but the argumentation is somewhat limited, particularly in the lack of specific examples or statistics that could strengthen their case. The mention of the challenges faced by families in suburban areas is relevant, but the focus on private homes deviates slightly from the main argument regarding tall apartment blocks. Overall, task achievement is moderate but requires a clearer structure and direct examples to fully satisfy the task requirements.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay shows a basic organizational structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, coherence suffers due to some awkward phrasing and a lack of clear transitions between ideas, particularly when shifting from discussing private homes to tall buildings. For example, the transition between discussing benefits of private homes and large buildings could be smoother. The use of paragraphing is present, but some sentences feel disjointed, which may confuse readers. More cohesive devices are needed for better flow.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The lexical resource section demonstrates a basic range of vocabulary, but it lacks precision and sophistication. Words like "long buildings" and "greatest number" could be replaced with more appropriate academic terms. Some aesthetic descriptions, though vivid, do not effectively contribute to the argument about apartment blocks. Examples include "shiny flowers" being less relevant to the discussion. There are instances of redundancy and vague phrasing, which need refinement for clearer expression of ideas. Overall, the vocabulary could be more varied and contextually fitting.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The grammatical range and accuracy of the response show some competence, but several errors hinder clarity. There are several issues with sentence structure, such as, "the vertical structure buildings provided the best way" which should be "tall buildings provide the best way to..." and "accommodation can given to only fewer people" should be "accommodation can be given to only a few people." These errors affect readability. The essay contains occasional complex sentences, but errors in simpler structures lead to confusion and detract from overall clarity. Attention to grammatical accuracy is necessary for improvement.
Overall feedback
The essay presents a clear stance on the topic, and the arguments indicate some understanding of urban living challenges. However, to strengthen your essay, focus on improving coherence by using clearer transitions between your points and enhancing the logical flow. Adding specific examples or statistical data would greatly improve your task achievement score. Pay attention to vocabulary choice and accuracy; using more precise language will elevate your writing. Furthermore, aim to minimize grammatical errors, especially in simpler sentences, to enhance clarity and readability.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.