Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-22
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The question of whether to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks remains a subject of intense academic and public debate. While some segments of society contend that to build tall apartment blocks, I firmly align with the perspective that agree .This essay will elucidate why this stance is more compelling, drawing upon relevant examples to substantiate the argument.
To begin with, there are several convincing justifications for supporting this perspective. Primarily, provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks acts as a vital catalyst for personal and societal advancement, significantly enhancing overall quality of life. By fostering innovative opportunities and cultivating advanced skill sets, individuals are empowered to navigate complex modern challenges with greater efficacy. Furthermore, this approach yields enduring structural benefits that transcend immediate advantages, contributing harmoniously to the sustainable progression of the community at large.
Conversely, critics often highlight potential drawbacks, such as economic burdens or psychological stress stemming from provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks. Nevertheless, such challenges are rarely insurmountable and can be effectively mitigated through meticulous planning and strategic regulatory frameworks. In the final analysis, the profound long-term dividends generated by this phenomenon far outweigh any transient disadvantages, provided that appropriate preventative safeguards are systematically implemented.
To recapitulate, although valid arguments can be marshalled on both sides of the debate, I remain convinced that provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks offers far more extensive benefits than drawbacks for both individuals and society. Consequently, concerted efforts should be directed toward maximizing its inherent advantages while judiciously curbing any associated risks.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0
Javobingiz savolni samarali yoritib bera olmagan. Mavzuni tan olgan bo'lsangiz-da, baland qavatli turar-joy binolari qurilishini yoqlab yoki unga qarshi haqiqiy argument keltirmagansiz. Buning o'rniga, inshoda deyarli har qanday mavzuga mos tushishi mumkin bo'lgan 'acts as a vital catalyst for personal and societal advancement' kabi mavhum va umumiy iboralar ishlatilgan. Siz baland binolar uy-joy tanqisligini qanday hal qilishini tushuntirmagansiz yoki zich yashashning aniq ijobiy va salbiy tomonlarini muhokama qilmadingiz. Inshoda shaharsozlik yoki uy-joy bilan bog'liq aniq mazmun yo'qligi sababli pozitsiyangiz noaniq qolgan. Yaxshilash uchun siz mavhum, qolipga o'xshash iboralardan foydalanish o'rniga, savolning mazmuni bilan bevosita ishlashingiz kerak.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
Insho standart paragraflarga bo'lingan va 'To begin with,' 'Conversely,' va 'In the final analysis' kabi bog'lovchi vositalardan foydalanishga aniq urinish bor. Biroq, g'oyalarning rivojlanishi zaif, chunki mazmunning o'zi savoldan uzilib qolgan. Havolalar ko'pincha chalkash; masalan, uchinchi paragrafdagi 'this phenomenon' iborasining aniq mazmuni yo'q, chunki siz hech qanday aniq hodisani tasvirlamagan, faqat mavhum tushunchalarni keltirgansiz. Tuzilish jihatidan mantiqiy bo'lsa-da, mazmunli ma'lumotlarning yo'qligi umumiy oqimni mexanik va takroriy qilib qo'ygan.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
Siz 'elucidate,' 'substantiate,' 'mitigated,' va 'transient' kabi akademik eshitiladigan so'zlarni o'z ichiga olgan lug'at boyligini namoyish etasiz. Biroq, ularning ishlatilishi ko'pincha g'ayritabiiy yoki kontekstda noto'g'ri. Masalan, 'provide enough homes... is to build tall apartment blocks' grammatik jihatdan noto'g'ri va ot frazasi vazifasini bajarmaydi. Lug'at shaharsozlik haqida aniq g'oyalarni ifodalash qobiliyatidan ko'ra, yodlangan iboralarga tayanishni ko'rsatadigan tarzda ishlatilgan. Bu aniqlikning yetishmasligiga va nazarda tutilgan ma'noni aniq yetkazib bera olmaslikka olib keladi.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5
Inshoda ravshanlikka to'sqinlik qiladigan jiddiy grammatik xatolar mavjud. Ko'pgina jumlalar noto'g'ri tuzilgan, masalan, 'I firmly align with the perspective that agree' kabi jumlalar tugallanmagan. 'provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks' iborasining ega sifatida qayta-qayta ishlatilishi butun matn davomida grammatik jihatdan noto'g'ri. Murakkab gap tuzilmalaridan foydalanishga uringan bo'lsangiz-da, asosiy grammatik nazoratning, xususan, ega-kesim moslashuvi va qo'shma gap qurilishidagi kamchiliklar tez-tez uchraydi. Xatolar tizimli va ko'pincha matnni tushunishni qiyinlashtiradi.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.