Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In Contemporary society, growing individuals are have come moved from rural side to urban site, where they lived in prepare to live in flats instead of house and it has sustainable solution for plethora of citizens. This essay will discuss I strongly agree with this notion. and This essay will explain the reasons for my position before conclusion is drawn.

One of the most compelling reason to support this fact is that, recent years people have moved on larger cities for their better future plenty of individuals familys lived are staying in one building. Nowadays huge amount of people are has settled in larger cities owing to this reason in cities insufficient crest the traffic congestion and insufficient place for living. This resulting government should

build high-rise appartmunts where which less utilize land. Also it is cost effective for the middle class families.

Further-or and in another crucial point is that providing modern facilities in full buildings. People are adopting moving to modern life-style and everyone busy with their work scheznuls. A flat and pro gives a plenty of facilities also it is safeer than the house. resulting reduce chunce of theft. For instance, in modern buildings provide purking space, garden for children, gym facilities, swimming pool and mung more which more attracts to young adults therefore their first priority to be bought flat instead of house.

To sum up I strongly believe that staying in full buildings in larger cities

To sum up I strongly believe that is great way to give enough house in cities because it's suitable for modern lifestyle and younge your cheuper thun house.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of tall apartment blocks. However, the development of ideas is inconsistent. While you mention land utilization and modern facilities, the arguments are often repetitive and lack depth. For instance, the point about 'traffic congestion' is introduced but not clearly linked to how tall buildings solve it. The conclusion is fragmented and repetitive, failing to synthesize the arguments effectively. To improve, ensure each paragraph focuses on a single, well-developed idea supported by clear reasoning and specific examples, rather than listing points in a disjointed manner.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical flow is frequently disrupted by awkward phrasing and incomplete sentences. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'For instance' and 'To sum up', but they are often applied mechanically or incorrectly (e.g., 'Further-or and in another crucial point'). The referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the progression of your argument. Paragraphing is present, but the internal structure of the paragraphs lacks the necessary cohesion to guide the reader smoothly through your points. Improving the use of transition signals and ensuring sentences connect logically is essential.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary range is limited and often imprecise. There are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'growing individuals are have come moved' and 'prepare to live in flats instead of house'. Some words are used incorrectly, such as 'crest' instead of 'create' and 'pro' instead of 'provides'. While you attempt to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'sustainable solution' and 'traffic congestion', the overall control is weak, and spelling errors (e.g., 'appartmunts', 'scheznuls', 'cheuper') occur throughout the text, which occasionally impedes the reader's understanding.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a high frequency of grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement issues ('people are has settled'), incorrect verb tenses, and fragmented sentence structures ('This resulting government should build...'). There is a lack of complex sentence structures, and the ones attempted are often grammatically incorrect, such as 'where which less utilize land'. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with several sentences ending abruptly or lacking necessary commas. To reach a higher band, you need to focus on mastering basic sentence construction and ensuring subject-verb agreement before attempting more complex grammatical structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.