Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, adjusting into new and large cities is becaming more challenging as compare to 20 year before it was, Specially into apartments and flats. I entirely agree that, contructions of tall and large building are merely the solution to this headache , which can also lead to more effortless lifstyle.

In this modern era, The population is dramatically increasing which indicates to develop more homes for survival. However, development of gigantic and tall apartments are the most reasonable and economic friendly alternatives, which cost less. Moreover, it provides more space at surroundings, thus, authorities can build parks and avenues for residents to spent there leisure time there which is also a alternative of home garden. For instance, if we talk about china and japan, who solved these dilemma by creating multiple homes in a single structure in there large cities, which provide more productive and fast less stressful life compare to those who lives in houses.

Altough, cost of contructions in present time is noticeably sky rocketing which is formidable for individuals to afford afford. If authorites, allow international investors who brings there money to make it possible to purchase flats via installments. On the other hand, this can also boost countries economy. Furthermore, moving to apartment in capital cities are provides unlocks number of opportunities such as, 24 hours transport, reachable and nearest emergency centers.

In conclusion this could be solve if government and internation investors both work to build buildings in large cities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of tall apartment blocks. However, the essay falls short of the 250-word minimum requirement, which negatively impacts the development of ideas. While you provide relevant examples like China and Japan, the explanation of these points is somewhat superficial. The argument regarding economic benefits and infrastructure is present but lacks depth. To improve, ensure you fully develop each supporting point with more detailed analysis and reach the required word count to avoid a penalty. The position is consistent, but the overall task fulfillment is limited by the brevity and lack of comprehensive exploration.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the argument. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'Altough' and 'On the other hand' used in contexts where they do not logically transition the ideas. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and the flow between sentences feels disjointed at times. While there is an attempt at a logical progression, the lack of sophisticated linking words and the repetitive structure of the sentences hinder the overall coherence. Improving the variety and precision of your transition signals will significantly enhance the readability of your work.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'gigantic', 'formidable', and 'infrastructure' (implied). However, there are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'economic friendly' instead of 'economically friendly' and 'fast less stressful' which is unclear. Spelling errors like 'contructions' and 'becaming' are also present. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey your main points, the lack of precision and the presence of spelling mistakes limit your score. Focus on learning common collocations and proofreading for basic spelling errors to improve your lexical range and accuracy.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('population is... indicates', 'investors who brings'), incorrect verb forms ('is becaming', 'could be solve'), and punctuation errors. These errors are noticeable and occasionally impede the flow of the text. While you attempt complex sentences, they are often faulty. To reach a higher band, you need to focus on mastering basic sentence construction, ensuring subject-verb agreement, and using articles and prepositions more accurately. Reducing the frequency of these errors is essential for a higher score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.