Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-10
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
It is often argued that the efficient way of providing home for citizens in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks. While other believe that it is inconvenient and dangerous to construct tall buildings. well, I strongly agree with the statement that constructing tall apartments for public can protect the people from becoming homeless.
One of the primary reason i agree is because tall buildings has enough space and are convinent for big family. As I have noticed tall apartments provides the facilities like swimming pool, zym, even skin care facilities which are crucial for our body.for instance, staying in apartment can provide safety from thieves, murder, and fraud which have became one of the great issue in today's world. Therefore apartments are one of the best and affordable place to stay for the local citizens or even the tourist who travel for pleasure.
Another significant reason, is apartment can build strong relationships with the people from the same building. In addition living in city area can provide the opportunity to take part in different activities like sports, learning new skill, and even to grab a new occupation. For instance if a person is active and educated he/she can be a teacher or tutor in school which helps to enhance their knowledge as well as earn money.
Therefore, living a stable and comfortable life is possible staying in city's apartment.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that constructing tall homes in city can benefit the people by renting a apartment to the tourist or even the local citizens. Also apartment plays a crucial role in today's world for the people who travel from village to cities insearch of opportunities or study.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position in favor of tall apartment blocks. However, the development of ideas is somewhat superficial. For example, the argument regarding 'safety from thieves, murder, and fraud' is a significant over-generalization and lacks logical support. Similarly, the point about building relationships is mentioned but not fully explored or linked back to the necessity of tall buildings specifically. While the response covers the topic, the supporting arguments are often anecdotal or lack the depth required for a higher band score. To improve, you should focus on providing more analytical reasons, such as land-use efficiency or urban density management, rather than focusing on peripheral benefits like gym facilities.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. For instance, the transition 'well, I strongly agree' is informal and inappropriate for an academic essay. Additionally, some sentences are disjointed, such as the sudden shift to discussing job opportunities in the third paragraph, which lacks a clear connection to the main topic of housing. While there is an overall progression, the lack of sophisticated linking words and the occasional awkward phrasing make the flow feel somewhat repetitive and limited.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and range required for higher bands. You rely on basic terms like 'big family', 'good', and 'best'. There are also noticeable errors in word choice and spelling, such as 'zym' (gym) and 'insearch' (in search). While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of variety and the presence of informal or misspelled words limit the score. To improve, focus on using more academic collocations and precise terminology related to urban planning and housing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow. Common issues include subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'tall buildings has', 'apartments provides'), missing articles (e.g., 'in city area'), and punctuation errors. While the meaning is usually understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. You should focus on proofreading for basic subject-verb agreement and ensuring that your sentence structures are grammatically sound before attempting more complex forms.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.