Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people argue that the best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build long apartment bluidings. I completely agree with this statement because the tall apartment consume less land which help them to control deforestation. Moreover, the tall buildings provide better oxygen and give basic facilarities in one building.

The tall apartments consume less land and give more houses to live, While in one story house only one family lives. The tall buildings are also helpful in a control of deforestation. Furthermore, The thousand of people lives in a tall building which is beneficial for environment. For example, In Islamabad the government build tall blocks which help them to save nature and also change the temperature of city.

The tall blocks are also good for health. Due to hight of blocks you can get fresh air and better quality of oxygen which is very benefical for your health. In addition, In tall buildings the basic faccilarities are available like you don't have to go to market for daily use stuff. In tall building you can get grocery, book shop etc in one place which also save your time.

In Conclusion, I completely agree that the best way to provide houses in big cities is to build tall apartments block. The tall blocks helps us to control the cutting of forest and other natural resources. It also help save our time by providing the essential things market in that buildings. Moreover, The oxygen level in tall blocks is very good which is good for our health.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position agreeing with the statement and supporting it with reasons such as land conservation, environmental protection, and health benefits. The main ideas are outlined throughout the essay, though they are somewhat repetitive and lack deeper extension. For instance, the point regarding oxygen and health is mentioned in both the third and fourth paragraphs without significant new development. Furthermore, some arguments rely on minor over-generalisations, such as the idea that tall buildings automatically change the temperature of a city. However, a clear stance is maintained from the introduction to the conclusion, satisfying the core requirements of a Band 6 response.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is divided into an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion, showing an overall logical arrangement. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct points, such as land use versus health benefits. However, cohesion within and between sentences is frequently faulty and mechanical. The student relies on basic and repetitive cohesive devices like 'Moreover', 'Furthermore', and 'In addition' to link ideas. Additionally, referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the sentence 'which help them to control deforestation' where the pronoun antecedent is ambiguous. Overall, while the progression of ideas is discernible, the mechanical cohesive ties place this writing firmly at Band 5.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The lexical resource is limited and heavily impacted by numerous spelling and word choice errors. Throughout the text, the student makes basic spelling errors, such as 'bluidings', 'facilarities', 'faccilarities', 'hight', and 'benefical'. The vocabulary used is quite repetitive, with phrases like 'tall apartment blocks', 'consume less land', and 'basic facilities' recurring frequently. While the student attempts less common vocabulary, inaccuracies in collocation and form prevent the response from achieving a higher band. The vocabulary is minimally adequate to convey the core message, which aligns with the descriptors for Band 5.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over basic structures. However, frequent grammatical errors are present throughout the text. There are recurring issues with articles ('in a control of deforestation', 'in big cities'), subject-verb agreement ('The thousand of people lives'), and singular/plural consistency ('tall apartments block'). Preposition usage is also occasionally awkward ('in a tall building'). Although these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur with high frequency and cause noticeable difficulty for the reader, which is characteristic of a Band 5 performance.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.