Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is extensively acknowledged that, the most convenient way to satisfy the basic requirements of individuals who lives in larger cities and in devloped areas is to providing flats and large apartments blocks. I agree, with the proposed thought and the reasons for my inclination are glanced in ensuing paragraphs.

It is fairly easy to comprehend the discussion by saying that, the people who lives in running cities they have to face problem of accomodation in their workplace. In these conditions flats assist office workers to stay and do their work without any unconvenience. Moreover, in cities there has been no enough space to build houses or mansion for businessmen or to live a luxury life in this context designers begin making of flats which take minimum space along with, provide all needs that require to live comfortably. It have been found in latest research in Dubai all the apartments that are going to build untill 2030 near burj khalifa are all prebooked by workers as well as tourists.

Probing ahead, these apartments are best for single person however, nowadays the most of flat desingns are designed by modern technology which makes apartments more advanced and also suitable for families. In addition, it also help those individuals who can not afford the house due to financial condition buying apartments for living is the good choice for those people. For instance, it had been found in 2020 40% masses were living in apartments with their families happily.

Agglomerating the aforementioned points it can be concluded that apartments make easier for workers who lives in cities along with,it gives opportunity to people lives in a artificial house that satisfy their feelings.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing whether building tall apartment blocks is the best way to provide enough homes in large cities, and the writer clearly states an agreement with this view. Main ideas are presented, such as accommodating office workers and saving urban space, but these points tend to be under-developed and lack extension. For example, the mention of Dubai's apartments or the 2020 statistic regarding families in apartments are introduced abruptly without sufficient analysis to fully support the argument. Additionally, there are minor generalisations regarding housing needs and luxury lifestyles. This places the response comfortably at Band 6, as all parts of the task are addressed, but the development of ideas remains somewhat limited and superficial throughout the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear stance established in the introduction and maintained through the body paragraphs. Paragraphing is utilised, although the transitions and linking phrases feel mechanical and sometimes awkward, such as 'Probing ahead' and 'Agglomerating the aforementioned points'. Cohesive devices are used, but referencing is occasionally unclear or faulty, as seen in pronoun usage ('It have been found' and 'it also help'). The flow of ideas between sentences is sometimes disrupted by phrasing that obscures logical progression. Consequently, these features align best with the Band 5 descriptors, as the text shows clear organisational structure and paragraphing, but the mechanical and occasionally inaccurate use of cohesion pulls the rating down.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common items such as 'accommodation', 'convenience', and 'financial condition'. However, there are numerous word choice and spelling inaccuracies throughout the text, including 'devloped' instead of developed, 'unconvenience' instead of inconvenience, 'desingns' instead of designs, and 'artificial house'. These errors occasionally cause strain for the reader, though communication is generally maintained. Collocations are not always natural, such as 'running cities' instead of bustling or major cities. Because the vocabulary is adequate for basic task completion but marred by frequent spelling and word-form errors, a Band 5 score is appropriate.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, including relative clauses ('individuals who lives in larger cities') and conditional ideas. However, control over grammar is weak, with frequent errors in subject-verb agreement ('individuals who lives', 'people who lives', 'it also help', 'worker who lives'), incorrect verb forms ('are going to build' instead of to be built, 'it had been found'), and punctuation issues, notably comma splices ('It is extensively acknowledged that, the most convenient way...'). These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader, matching the Band 5 profile where a limited range of structures is attempted and complex sentences are often faulty.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.