Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The most effictive way to provide enough housing in big cites is to construct high rise appartment buldings.I totaly agree with this statement because more people can get homes.Apartments can save land also it can affordable instead of house.

Apartments play a important role in our sociaty.Firstly, we can get more homes because of apartments.Apartments have more facielties such as elevouter and huge parking area instead of house.Apartments are bulid in a vertical shapes so it can save land.we can consume this land in other facilties like park and schools. For instance,80% people in pakistan perfer to live in apartments instead of house.

Moreover,Apartments are avilable in low prices.Apartments have cheap prices so poor people can also afford homes.On the other hand houses are expensive.Moreover,officials can provide better public transport easly.Apartments can also reduce shortage of houses. For example,in large cities such as lahore, many people can not afford a large house.Therefore, affordable flats can help middle class families find suitable homes at a lowercast.

In conclusion,i agree that bulding tall apartment blocks in one of the best ways to provide enough home in large cities. this is because they can save land, accomodated more people and provide affordable housing. Therfore, gorvments should encourage the construction of more apartments buldings in crowded cities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position in agreement with building tall apartment blocks to solve housing shortages. However, the ideas are limited and under-developed, relying on repetitive points about saving land and providing affordable housing without deeper elaboration. Furthermore, the length requirement is not met, as the response contains only 213 words, falling short of the 250-word minimum. This lack of extended support and insufficient word count keeps the task response at a limited level, as key arguments regarding urban planning or infrastructure are only briefly mentioned rather than fully explored.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is some basic organisation with paragraphing used to separate distinct points, such as facilities and pricing. However, there is no clear overall progression of ideas, and transitions between sentences feel mechanical or abrupt, often relying on repetitive connectors like 'moreover' and 'for example'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the mechanical repetition of words like 'apartments' creates a choppy flow that impedes smooth reading. While the text attempts to group related ideas together, the lack of sophisticated cohesive devices and logical transitions prevents the essay from achieving a higher level of coherence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and barely adequate for the task, with noticeable spelling and word choice errors throughout the text. Examples include 'effictive' instead of effective, 'appartment buldings' instead of apartment buildings, 'facielties' instead of facilities, and 'elevouter' instead of elevator. There are also issues with word form and phrasing, such as 'avlable in low prices' instead of available at low prices, and 'lowercast' instead of lower cost. These errors and the heavy repetition of basic lexical items cause some difficulty for the reader and reflect a restricted vocabulary range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer demonstrates a very limited range of sentence structures, relying mostly on simple sentences with frequent errors in complex structures. There are noticeable issues with subject-verb agreement, such as 'it can affordable' and 'building... is one of the best ways... this is because they can...'. Article usage is frequently missing or incorrect, as seen in 'instead of house' and 'in vertical shapes'. Additionally, punctuation and capitalization errors are widespread, including missing spaces after periods and lowercase letters at the beginnings of sentences or proper nouns. These frequent errors cause strain and difficulty for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.