Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is often argued that providing more number of home to homeless is by building a tall apartment block.In my opinion i completely agree with the said notion because it will be affordable and convinent to citizen.

To commence with there are lots of benefits of this given statement. To predominat one is no maintenance cost. To explain it, person do not need to pay any extra cost rathher than rent for any kind of developmet and service work done in a apartment.Moreover second idea is easy monthly cost, for example citizen can pay their money on installment and be owner of apartmentr after certain period of time .It makes owner hassle and tension free and they can rent their apartment after they leave it.Big apartment attracts lots of tourist from different countries and helps in countries GDP.

Further explaining my views, their are some drawback aslo like no access to personal garden and gym . All have to do by sharing and second is , freedom and lots of noise disturbance created by close room partner such as,you can not call your friends relatives lately and play music since it can disturb other. Person have to face every kind situation and can not do anything at that momemt of time. Although it hase some negative impact it is good for many.Apartment helps strudent a lot to study at cities and town by paying nominal monthly rent and helps in achieving theit goals.

To conclude,apartment is good for people with job in cities town for certain period . it has lot of benifits and some drawback also .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the task only partially and presents a position, although it is not always clear throughout the entire essay. The writer manages to express a clear viewpoint in the introduction by stating a complete agreement with building tall apartment blocks for affordability and convenience. However, the ideas presented to support this position remain limited and under-developed. For instance, the arguments regarding maintenance costs and monthly installments are mentioned briefly without sufficient extension or detailed examples. Similarly, while the counter-arguments acknowledging drawbacks such as a lack of personal gardens and increased noise disturbance are introduced in the third paragraph, they lack the depth required to fully explore both sides of the prompt. To move to a higher band, the writer needs to develop each main idea more thoroughly by providing concrete explanations and well-elaborated examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some overall organization with an identifiable introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which gives it a recognizable structure. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the arrangement of ideas feels somewhat disjointed. Cohesive devices are used, but they tend to be inadequate, inaccurate, or repetitive, such as the repeated use of phrases like 'To commence with' and 'Further explaining my views.' Paragraphing is attempted, though the division of ideas could be managed more logically; for example, grouping the discussion of economic benefits and disadvantages more clearly would improve the flow. Additionally, referencing is occasionally unclear, making it harder for the reader to follow the logical connections between sentences. To achieve a higher level, the writer must ensure that cohesive devices are employed with greater accuracy and variety, and that each paragraph transitions smoothly into the next to establish a stronger sense of progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The lexical resource is limited and minimally adequate for the task, demonstrating a restricted vocabulary range. The student makes noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling throughout the response, such as 'convinent', 'predominat', 'rathher', 'developmet', 'apartmentr', 'strudent', and 'theit'. These slips and inaccuracies can cause some difficulty for the reader. While the writer attempts to use some less common vocabulary related to housing and city life, such as 'installment' and 'maintenance', the execution is flawed due to persistent lexical errors. To improve this criterion, the writer needs to expand their working vocabulary, pay closer attention to standard spelling conventions, and ensure that words are chosen and formed correctly according to the intended context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay utilizes a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple sentences alongside attempts at complex forms that are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in basic grammatical patterns, including article usage, pluralization, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions within grammatical structures, as seen in phrases like 'providing more number of home', 'person do not need', and 'close room partner'. Punctuation is also problematic in several places, with missing spaces and incorrect comma placements. These frequent errors can cause difficulty and strain for the reader. To reach the next band, the writer should focus on expanding their structural repertoire while increasing grammatical accuracy, ensuring that basic agreements and verb forms are controlled reliably across the majority of sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.