Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people believe that,developing infrastructural changes in buildings into skyscrapers will resolve the pressing issue of housing.However,there are also some individuals who thinks otherwise.This essay agrees with the latter view because issues like housing should be solved with proper land planning rather than constructing high-rise buildings.Proper land-use planning can provide a better and foremost solution to this issue.

Admiteddly,it is clear that,building more apartment blocks will create spaces for individuals living on roads or slums to reside.Nevertheless,the implementation of proper land-use planning will definetely provide a clearer path to the governement bodies.Furthermore,the land planning will create spaces with environmental concerns keeping in consideration.For instance,the people who lives in slums or roads have no homes for themselves because the government planning of infrastructural development does not consider the people within it.Consequntly, this may lead to,for instance; social degradation and serious crimes.Because the people living under the standards are having serious issues regarding their houses.They may think that they are excluded from the society becayse of their income scales.As a result,it may lead to serious crimes in order to breaking the bread for their families.

Additionally,constructing skyscrapers and more apartment blocks will cause serious environmental degradtion which will take us to varous environmental concerns such as; the buildings will be constructed as a consequence of cutting trees which will cause dehydration issues and plenty of other diseases among people.Moreover,the apartment building blocks will leave the areas being congested which will result in lack of windflows and proper sunlight coming in houses.From my perspective, the government bodies should come forward with a master plan of housing careful land use planning associated with related mastery in these departments.

In conclusion,my perception aligns with the proper usage of the realm of government bodies in accordance with the idea of structural mapping of any areas.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear stance against building tall apartment blocks, suggesting proper land-use planning instead. However, the development of ideas remains limited and under-developed. For instance, the link between improper government planning and social degradation leading to crime is stated broadly without sufficient supporting evidence or clear examples from your own knowledge or experience. While you present a position throughout the essay, the arguments tend to loop back to general statements about government bodies and housing rather than thoroughly exploring the consequences of skyscrapers versus land planning. To move towards a higher standard, ensure that every main idea is extended with specific explanations and well-contextualised examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some overall organization, with paragraphs introduced to separate different arguments, such as social consequences and environmental degradation. Nevertheless, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the arrangement of ideas can feel somewhat repetitive. Cohesive devices are sometimes used inaccurately or mechanically, and punctuation errors around transitions interfere with smooth reading, such as in phrases like 'Admiteddly,it is clear that,building more'. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, leaving the reader to deduce how certain clauses connect. To achieve a stronger flow, you should utilize a wider and more accurate range of cohesive markers and ensure that each paragraph builds logically upon the previous one without circling back to the same points.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate to convey a basic argument regarding housing and urban development. There are noticeable lexical errors, including spelling mistakes such as 'Admiteddly' and 'definetely', alongside awkward word choices and collocations like 'breaking the bread' or 'dehydration issues' in the context of cutting trees. These errors do cause some difficulty for the reader and reflect a restricted range of vocabulary. To improve your lexical score, focus on eliminating basic spelling mistakes, learning accurate word forms, and incorporating precise, less common items related to urban planning and sociology naturally within your sentences.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writing relies on a limited range of grammatical structures, and attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in punctuation, spacing, and subject-verb agreement throughout the text, such as 'the people who lives in slums' and numerous missing spaces after commas and periods. Furthermore, awkward phrasing stems from grammatical control issues in patterns like 'keeping in consideration'. These frequent errors can cause difficulty for the reader. To progress, you should aim to diversify your sentence patterns while carefully monitoring basic agreement rules, punctuation spacing, and accurate clause construction to ensure clearer communication.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.