Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued that by costructing huge residential blocks people can have mpre homes . I firmly disagree with the view that building more huge buidings provide enough home due to several compelling reasons.

To coomece with, one of the most sognicficant reason is that for making more apartment blocks more land will be required which means forests will be cut down. In other words , makinh more homes for human beings will directly affect natural habitat of wild animals. This clearly destroys that variety of wild species and make them extinct.

Moreover, another crucial factor to consider is that cutting forests will also impact human weelbeing. Furthermore, tress are main source of oxygen and provides clean air to inhale. Therefore , building more apartment blocks also a risk to human wellbeing.

To conclude, although some may argue that building more apartment blocks will provide enough homes but i stronly disgaree as this could be dangerous to human and animals wellbeing.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

Your position is clear: you disagree with tall apartment blocks, and you give two related concerns—loss of wildlife habitat and harm to human wellbeing. However, the response addresses the task only partially. The reasons are asserted rather than sufficiently explained, and the essay does not consider why high-rise housing might provide homes efficiently or clarify whether your objection is to tall buildings specifically or to construction that removes forests. The conclusion repeats your view but adds no support. The response is also 88 words below the required minimum, which limits the opportunity to develop relevant examples and reasoning. To strengthen the response, explain each point with a specific example and address the central claim about housing supply.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall arrangement: an introduction states your position, two body paragraphs present reasons, and a conclusion restates your view. Linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude” help signal these stages. However, progression within the body paragraphs is limited: the second paragraph largely repeats the forest-related point rather than developing a distinct argument, and the relationship between building apartment blocks and cutting forests is not made fully clear. Some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “Furthermore” and “Therefore.” Develop one main idea per paragraph, connect each claim to its consequence with clearer explanation, and use referencing or transitions that show the precise relationship between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “residential blocks,” “natural habitat,” “wild animals,” and “human wellbeing,” so the reader can follow your main concerns. However, the range is limited and several spelling errors make the writing less controlled, for example “costructing,” “sognicficant,” “makinh,” and “stronly.” Some word combinations are also inaccurate or awkward: “variety of wild species” does not express the intended idea clearly, and “a risk to human wellbeing” needs a more natural construction. Aim for accurate, precise phrases rather than repeating “apartment blocks” and “building more.” Proofread spelling carefully and practise collocations such as “provide housing,” “destroy wildlife habitats,” and “pose a risk.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple sentences and more complex forms, including a reason clause (“as this could be dangerous”) and a result structure (“which means forests will be cut down”). Most of the main ideas remain understandable, but some errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction reduce accuracy. For example, “one of the most … reason” needs a plural noun, while “tress are main source of oxygen and provides” has problems with both the article and subject–verb agreement. The sentence beginning “although some may argue” also needs a clearer contrast structure. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, correct singular/plural agreement, and necessary articles. More accurate control of these patterns would make your arguments easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.