Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Discribtions:

The staement is "The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks". From my side I, totally agreed with the statement that best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartments blocks.

As everyone knows bangladesh as over populated country. The number of people living in individual cities increasing day by day. As matter of fact enough home weren't provided in large cities.

Reason:

So, the best option for preventing the problem was to build tall apartment blocks in large cities. By doing this some of the problems got solved.

Why:

As Dhaka the main city of Bangladesh people came here for better life style. But is there are not enough for them. So, it has becaome a very serious matter of concern.

Example:

As a result tall apartment was created to prevent this kind problem. After a while this strategy go succed and everyone tried to implement it. Many people got benefited by the strategy which were implemented over the time.

In rural areas we don't need any kind of large apartments or tall building because of less population than dhaka or the main cities. Due to tall apartment blocks it has also decreased the number of bill pay amount.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You state a clear position in the opening, saying you “totally agreed” that tall apartment blocks are the best solution, and you refer to Dhaka and population growth, which are relevant to the question. However, the response only partially develops this view: claims such as “some of the problems got solved” and “everyone tried to implement it” are not explained or supported with specific evidence. The point about lower bills is also unclear and not linked convincingly to providing enough homes. The response contains 186 words, below the required 250; 29 words copied from the task prompt were not counted. Develop two or three reasons with concrete examples and explain how each supports your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic sequence: it introduces your opinion, mentions population growth, then gives reasons and an example. Headings such as “Reason,” “Why,” and “Example” signal the intended structure, but they do not create a clear progression between developed paragraphs. Several points are isolated or repeated, and links between them are difficult to follow—for example, the move from Dhaka’s housing shortage to the claim that the strategy succeeded is not explained. The final point about rural areas and bills also arrives without a clear connection to the main argument. Organise the essay into an introduction, focused body paragraphs, and a conclusion, using linking phrases to show cause, contrast, and result.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “over populated,” “large cities,” “apartment blocks,” and “population,” so the reader can identify the subject of the essay. However, the range is limited and several word choices or forms make the meaning unclear, such as “bill pay amount” and “this kind problem.” Spelling errors, including “Discribtions,” “staement,” and “becaome,” are noticeable and reduce the accuracy of the writing. Some phrases are also repetitive, particularly references to “tall apartment blocks” and “the strategy.” Build a wider set of accurate housing and urban-planning terms, and check spelling and collocations carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

Most sentences use simple patterns, and you attempt a few longer structures, such as “As Dhaka the main city of Bangladesh people came here for better life style.” However, sentence boundaries and clause structure are often faulty, so the reader has to infer the intended meaning. There are frequent problems with verb forms and agreement: “The number of people … increasing” needs a finite verb, while “this strategy go succed” has an incorrect verb construction. Articles and sentence punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “As matter of fact enough home weren't provided.” Practise building accurate subject–verb sentences first, then combine them with clear subordinate clauses and check tense consistency.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.