Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The best way to provide enough homes in large cities is to build tall apartment blocks.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is often said that the best possible way to provide adequate homes to people in large cities is to build high-rise residential buildings. While I agree that building tall apartment blocks increases the number of homes, I believe that it can also be dangerous if proper precautions are not taken while building.

Nowadays, finding a proper home has become a widespread issue all over the world. We see people complaining about house shortages everytime. This is because the population is increasing rapidly and the land available is limited. For example, I have a collegue who got married recently and was looking for a home in Hyderabad. It took him about 2 months to find a proper place to live in, sufficient for 2 people. Therefore, these kind of problems can be tackled by constructing tall apartment blocks and making them available for sale or rental.

Despite these advantages, living in tall buildings can also have some disadvantages especially during natural calamities. High-rise buildings are prone to fall apart if not built properly or even during earthquakes and tsunamis. For instance, recent earthquakes in Nepal caused many building to fall apart. Although, this does not only apply to tall buildings, they are the ones that are destroyed first in case of such disasters. Therefore, I believe safety of people is of high priorty and living in tall buildings can comprimise it.

Although, building tall apartment blocks sounds like an effective solution to reduce the shortage of homes, it can have adverse affects in difficult situations. However, it can be made more promising if appropriate measures are taken to ensure the safety of the residents.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you accept that high-rise blocks can increase housing supply, while arguing that safety risks make them problematic without precautions. The response addresses both the benefit and the drawback, and the Hyderabad example gives the housing shortage a personal illustration. However, the discussion of how apartment blocks provide enough homes is brief, and the earthquake point is asserted rather than fully explained; the Nepal example does not show specifically why tall buildings are more vulnerable. The conclusion repeats your position but does not clarify the conditions under which you would support this solution. Develop each main idea with a clearer explanation and relevant evidence to make the response more fully supported.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, a paragraph on housing supply, a paragraph on safety, and a conclusion. This makes the main line of argument easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “For example,” “Despite these advantages,” and “Therefore” to show relationships between ideas. At times, however, the connections feel mechanical, and some references are not fully clear. For example, “they are the ones that are destroyed first” does not establish precisely which buildings or provide support for the comparison. The conclusion also largely repeats the introduction. Use a wider range of transitions and make each paragraph’s reasoning progress from claim to explanation and evidence.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “high-rise residential buildings,” “population,” “land available,” “natural calamities,” and “appropriate measures.” These choices communicate the subject clearly, and some less common expressions show an attempt to be precise. There are, however, several spelling and word-choice errors, such as “everytime,” “collegue,” “priorty,” and “comprimise.” Some phrasing is also imprecise: “proper home” and “proper place” are repeated, while “adverse affects” is not the intended form in this context. Aim for more accurate collocations and vary repeated general terms—for instance, distinguish between housing availability, affordability, and safety rather than relying on “proper.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession in “While I agree…” and a conditional structure in “if proper precautions are not taken.” Most sentences remain understandable, and the errors do not prevent the reader from following your argument. Some grammatical inaccuracies persist, however. In “these kind of problems,” the demonstrative and noun do not agree; “many building to fall apart” has an incorrect plural and verb construction; and “Although, this does not only apply…” uses punctuation and clause structure awkwardly. There are also comma-placement issues after introductory conjunctions. Review agreement, clause formation, and punctuation, then proofread complex sentences to ensure each clause is complete and correctly connected.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.