Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The plan given shows how a college cafe was before it was redesigned and how it looks now that it has been redesigned.

Overall, the college cafe before it was reinnovated did not consist of many subgroups or have an outdoor arrangement but this is seen with the reinnovated plan. It seems to have a different cooridination of activites for potential staff and users of this facility.

The cafe before it was redesigned had an open area for the tables and chair with a section cut out for staff to dine. The kitchen and serving area together apart from the general dinning area. It is all just in one main building,along with the tables and chairs, a portion for the toilet and a little cut out for the bin.

While for the reformed plan, it has a more sophisticate outlook and over view with many new parts. There is the barbecue area right next to the outdoor seating, the general table and chair area which seems to be consistent in both plans, but there is aition of salad bar, take away food area, coffee bar and even a hot meal section. Another important ting worth noting is the amount of doors the new plan has as well are the renaming of the bin area to recycling bin.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover the main contrast between the original café and its redesigned version, and your overview identifies the addition of outdoor facilities and more specialised food and drink areas. You also correctly note that the central seating area and toilets remain, and that the bin becomes a recycling point. This meets the task well, though some features are reported less fully than others: for example, the two former staff dining rooms are not clearly linked to the new takeaway and coffee-bar sections, and the new southern doors are mentioned without explaining that they lead outside. The phrase “amount of doors” is also not supported by a clear comparison. To strengthen the response further, describe the key changes precisely and avoid vague claims such as “more sophisticated outlook.”

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall shape: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs describing the former and current layouts. This makes the comparison easy to follow at a broad level. However, progression within the paragraphs is sometimes uneven, and several ideas are joined in long or loosely connected sentences. For instance, the final paragraph moves from the barbecue and seating to food counters and then to doors and bins without a consistent spatial order. Linking phrases such as “Overall” and “While” help signal the structure, but some connections are mechanical or unclear. Organise each description by location—for example, north wall, western side, central area, then outside—and use clearer sentence boundaries to make relationships between changes more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of vocabulary for describing a redesigned space, including “outdoor seating,” “salad bar,” “take away food area,” and “recycling bin.” However, several word choices are inaccurate or unnatural for this task, which limits precision. “Reinnovated” and “reformed plan” are not suitable ways to describe the redesign, while “different cooridination of activites” does not clearly express the layout’s functional changes. There are also spelling errors, including “cooridination,” “dinning,” “aition,” and “ting.” Some phrases, such as “sophisticate outlook,” are difficult to interpret. Prefer straightforward, accurate terms such as “redesigned,” “layout,” and “facilities,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex sentence forms, including contrast with “While” and clauses introduced by “which.” Meaning is generally recoverable, but errors in sentence construction and punctuation sometimes make the relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “The kitchen and serving area together apart from the general dinning area” is a fragment, and “It is all just in one main building,along with…” has awkward sentence structure and missing spacing after the comma. In “there is aition of salad bar,” the grammatical frame is incomplete, and the final sentence contains a long sequence of items that is difficult to control. Practise complete subject–verb sentences, accurate articles and plurals, and punctuation that separates lists from the main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.