Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given diagrams compare the layout of a college cafe before and how it looks now.

Overall, it is clear that the majority of new things are constructed inand outside of the cafe, while a minority of areas are still stable.

A close observation of a first diagram illustrate that the kitchen was built on north corner. However, serving area was located below the kitchen from where all foods and drinks were served. Beside it door was situated. In the middle of a cafe they put tables and chairs. Meanwhile, above it staffing dining rooms were built. Moreover, bin was put on the east side and toilets were situated on the southeast corner.

Moving on to the current cafe design. The lowest number of things are unchanged like kitchen, tables and chais, and toilets. Additionally, serving area replace by a hot meals and new salad bar open on the west side. Apart from it, they seprate staffing dining area and build take away food and coffee bar. Also, they put recycling bins instead of a bin. Subsequently, they start barbecue area and outdoor seating on the south side with two doors.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover the main before-and-after changes and give a clear overview that most of the redesign is new while some areas remain. The kitchen, central tables and chairs, and toilets are correctly identified as unchanged; you also report the new salad bar, takeaway and coffee sections, recycling bins, barbecue and outdoor seating. This is a relevant, reasonably complete account. However, some details are unclear or imprecise: “the majority of new things” is vague, and “they separate staffing dining area” does not explain that the two former staff dining rooms were replaced by takeaway food and a coffee bar. The outdoor seating is mentioned, but its four tables and the new southern doors could be described more clearly. More precise comparisons would strengthen the overview and coverage.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a description of the original plan, and a paragraph on the current layout. Sequencing phrases such as “Overall,” “Meanwhile,” and “Moving on” help the reader follow the comparison, and the main areas are generally grouped sensibly. At times, however, the linking feels mechanical or the reference is unclear. For example, “Beside it door was situated” leaves the location of the door uncertain, while “Apart from it” and “Subsequently” do not express the relationships between changes very naturally. The current-plan paragraph also lists several features without consistently comparing each one with its former position or function. Use clearer references and organise changes into related groups to make progression more fluent.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough task-related vocabulary to identify the main features, including “kitchen,” “serving area,” “salad bar,” “recycling bins,” and “outdoor seating.” Some wording also attempts to describe change, such as “replace by” and “instead of.” However, the range and control are limited by imprecise or unnatural expressions: “new things,” “areas are still stable,” and “the lowest number of things are unchanged” do not convey the changes accurately or naturally. There are also spelling errors, including “chais” and “seprate,” and awkward collocations such as “staffing dining rooms.” These do not prevent the reader from understanding the general layout, but they reduce precision. Prefer standard map language such as “facilities,” “remain unchanged,” and “were replaced by.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including contrast with “while” and sequencing with “Moving on to the current cafe design.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but grammatical control is inconsistent, and several errors occur in basic sentence patterns. For example, “A close observation … illustrate” has subject–verb disagreement, while “serving area was located” and “they separate … and build” use articles or verb forms inaccurately. The phrase “The lowest number of things are unchanged” also has faulty agreement and construction. Some sentences omit necessary articles or use awkward clause structure, as in “Beside it door was situated.” Work on consistent past-tense descriptions of the former plan, accurate passive forms for changes, and complete article and agreement patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.