Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

THE PROVIDED TWO DIFFERENT DIAGRAMS ILLUSRATE THE OLD AND NEW LOOK OF COFFEE SHOP WHICH IS IN COLLEGE.

IN AN OVERVIEW, IT IS CLEARLY SEEN THAT KITCHEN AREA IS STILL AT SAME PLACE WHEREAS THERE ARE ALOTS OF NEW ADDITIION ADDED IN TODAY'S CAFE.

TO COMMENCE WITH,IN THE CORNER OF NORTHWEST THE KITCHEN IS AT SAME PLACE BUT THE SERVING AREA IS REPLACE BY HOT MEALS. MOREOVER,SALAD BAR IS CONSTRUCTED IN WEST AND NEXT TO IT BARBECUE IS ESTABLISH BUT IN OLD MAP OF CAFE THERE IS NOTHING.FURTHERMORE,STAFF DINING ROOM IS REEPLACED BYDIFFERENT COURTS SUCH AS COFFE BAR AS WELL AS FOOD TAKE AWAY.

MOVING AHEAD,IN EAST THE AREA OF BINS ARE SMALL BUT AFTER RENOVATION THAT AREA IS INCREASE THEN MOVING DOWN TOWARS THE CORNER OF SOUTH EAST THE TOILETS ARE REMAIN AT SAME . AT LAST, NEW OUTDOOR SEATING IS ESTABLISH AND THE TABLES AND CHAIRS ARE STILL OIN THE CENTRE OF CAFE.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main overall change: the kitchen stays in the same place, while new facilities are added, and you compare several features between the plans. Details such as the serving counter becoming a hot-meals area, the staff dining rooms being replaced by takeaway and coffee facilities, and the toilets remaining in the south-east are grounded in the plans. The overview is present, but “a lots of new addition” is broad and does not clearly summarise the most significant changes, especially the new outdoor seating and barbecue. Some details are also unclear or inaccurate: the barbecue is south-west of the building, not next to the salad bar, and the bins are identified as recycling bins rather than an enlarged bin area. A more precise overview and fuller coverage of the outdoor changes would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two body sections that move through the café’s features. Sequencing phrases such as “To commence with” and “Moving ahead” help signal progression, and the reader can generally follow the comparisons. However, the organisation is sometimes mechanical, and several ideas are crowded together in long sentences, particularly the first body paragraph. The repeated use of “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” and “At last” does not always show the precise relationship between details. Grouping the changes by location or by what was replaced and added would make the progression clearer. Use more accurate referencing and transitions so that the barbecue, outdoor seating, and recycling bins are connected to their correct positions and changes.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant plan vocabulary, including “kitchen,” “serving area,” “staff dining room,” “toilets,” and “outdoor seating,” which makes the main subject clear. There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “renovation” and “replaced.” However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word choices are noticeable, including “ILLUSRATE,” “ADDIITION,” “courts,” and “area of bins are small.” Some phrases are difficult to interpret, and “coffee shop” is less consistent with the task’s description of a café. Aim for accurate labels and natural collocations: for example, describe facilities as being “added” or “introduced,” and say that the single bin was replaced by recycling bins. Careful proofreading would improve clarity and control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including contrasts with “whereas” and clauses introduced by “but.” This gives the report some structural variety. However, grammatical errors occur throughout and sometimes make relationships between features unclear. Examples include “the serving area is replace,” “the toilets are remain,” and “the tables and chairs are still” followed by an unclear ending. Articles and agreement also need attention, as in “in the corner of northwest” and “a lots of new addition.” Several sentences lack appropriate punctuation or have awkward clause connections. Practise forming accurate passive structures (“was replaced by”), using present-tense descriptions consistently, and checking subject–verb agreement and articles. More reliable control of these basics would make your comparisons easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.