Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The plan shows a college cafe after and before it was redesigned.

Overall, the cafe has been improved by adding food areas and outdoor seatin. The main tables and chairs area has remained , while several facilitices has been changed or added .

Before the redesign, the kitchen and serving area were located in the upper-left corner. Most of the café was used for tables and chairs. There were also two staff dining rooms in the upper middle section. A bin was located on the right side, while the toilets were in the bottom-right corner.

After the redesign, the serving area was replaced by a hot meals section. The two staff dining rooms were removed and replaced with a take-away food area and a coffee bar. A salad bar was added on the left side, while a barbecue area was introduced outside the café. In addition, recycling bins were placed on the right side. The toilets remained in the bottom-right corner. Finally, outdoor seating with several tables and chairs was added below the café

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The response gives a clear overview of the main changes: the central seating area and toilets remain, while new food facilities and outdoor seating are introduced. It also accurately describes the former staff dining rooms being replaced by takeaway food and a coffee bar, and the serving counter becoming a hot-meals section. These details address the task and are supported by relevant comparisons. Some spatial information is generalised: for example, “on the left side” does not specify that the salad bar is along the western wall, and the new southern doors and the barbecue’s position beside the outdoor seating are not explained. More precise reporting of these relationships would make the account more complete and better developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response is arranged in a clear sequence, moving from an overview to the café before and after the redesign. Paragraphing helps distinguish the two stages, and linking expressions such as “Before the redesign,” “After the redesign,” and “In addition” make the progression easy to follow. This provides a coherent overall account. However, the connections between some details are fairly list-like, and the final sentence adds another change without linking it closely to the new southern access. There are also small presentation interruptions, such as the extra spaces in “The main” and before the comma in “remained ,” which make cohesion less polished. Grouping changes by location and using clearer references would strengthen the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary is sufficient to describe the main features, with useful terms such as “replaced,” “introduced,” “remained,” and “outdoor seating.” However, the range is limited and some choices are imprecise or incorrectly formed. “Improved” gives an opinion rather than neutrally describing the redesign, while “facilitices” is a misspelling and “seatin” is incomplete. “Food areas” is also broad when the specific facilities are available, and “several tables” could be more precise because the plan shows four outdoor tables. Aim for accurate, neutral map vocabulary and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise location phrases would also help distinguish the western wall, southern entrance, and outdoor area.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response uses a mixture of simple sentences and some longer structures, including “while” clauses and passive forms such as “was replaced” and “were removed and replaced.” These allow the main comparisons to be communicated clearly. However, grammatical control is inconsistent. In the overview, “several facilitices has been changed or added” has a subject–verb agreement error and an incorrect verb form; it should be structured along the lines of “several facilities have been changed or added.” The phrase “the café after and before it was redesigned” is awkwardly ordered, and punctuation spacing is inconsistent in “remained ,”. More accurate agreement, sentence framing, and proofreading are needed to make the range of structures reliable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.