Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The diagram illustrates how a college cafeteria looked before and after it was renovated.

Overall, The cafe became more considerably developed, with new things like outdoor seating and Barbecue.It had a single counter for serving both food and drinks but now it has multiple sections allotted for drinks and meals.

The Toilets, Tables and chairs section did not go through any change. In addition to that, the kitchen and the entrance is also located in the same place.Bin has been replaced by a recycling bin making things more environmental friendly.

On the other hand, The Serving are now serves only hotmeals.Whereas, the staff dining rooms have been replaced by two distinct take away food and coffee bar for ease of access.There is now a salad bar on the left taking away a small spot from main sitting area. Now, there is also a outdoor seating area with open air barbecue spot as new addition to the cafe's menu.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover the main changes and give a clear overview: the café now has outdoor seating and a barbecue, while the former single serving counter has been divided into food and drink facilities. You also correctly note that the toilets and central seating remain, and that the bin has become recycling bins. This meets the task well, with relevant comparisons across the plans. To make the account more complete and precise, describe the new southern doors and the four outdoor tables, and clarify that the kitchen remains in the same position. The claim that the salad bar takes space from the seating area is not clearly supported by the plan. Some details are therefore less fully developed than the overall changes.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two paragraphs describing unchanged features and alterations. This gives the reader a generally coherent account, and phrases such as “In addition to that” and “On the other hand” help signal relationships. However, the progression is not always smooth: the second body paragraph moves from the serving counter to staff facilities, then the salad bar and outdoor area without a clear spatial or thematic order. Some linking phrases feel mechanical or do not express the relationship precisely. Organising the changes by location—for example, north wall, western side, then south exterior—and using clearer references would make the comparisons easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “renovated,” “replaced,” “distinct,” and “outdoor seating,” so the main changes are understandable. However, several choices are imprecise or unnatural for describing a plan: “more considerably developed,” “things,” “allotted,” and “taking away a small spot” do not convey the layout clearly. There are also noticeable spelling and word-form issues, such as “hotmeals” and “Serving are,” and “cafe’s menu” inaccurately suggests a menu rather than a facility. Aim for precise spatial and functional language, such as “located,” “converted into,” and “occupies part of the former seating area.” This would improve clarity and control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mix of simple statements and more complex comparisons, including “Whereas, the staff dining rooms have been replaced…” and “The Toilets, Tables and chairs section did not go through any change.” Meaning is generally recoverable, but grammatical errors occur across the response. Examples include subject–verb agreement in “the entrance is also located” after “the kitchen and the entrance,” and “The Serving are now serves”; the latter also has an incorrect verb construction. Articles and plurals are inconsistent in “a outdoor seating area” and “a recycling bin” when the plan shows recycling bins. Capitalisation and punctuation are also uneven, particularly after full stops. Check agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, and revise complex comparisons into complete, controlled sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.