Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-22

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

The plans below show a college cafe before it was redesigned and how it looks now.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pictures Illustrates a college cafe from its intial to its newly formed design.

Overall, the cafe expanded over the time by adding extra outdoor seats for specific kind of guest. In addition, adding new sectors like Salad bar and Coffe bar by replacing Staff dinning room.

Initially, the cafe had a very minimal design where the kitchen served both drinks and kind of foods, where later on words it was divided as the kitchen only served hot meals. The rest were foods and drinks were divided by sector as a coffe bar which was in the place of staf dining room Including a take away food corner.

Furthermore, on the left middle corner a salad bar was given while minimalising the tables and chairs space as more were added outside infront of the new barbecue spot. The toiets were same just the bins were changed to recycling bins. While 2 more gates were added along the toilets which takes the customers to the outdoor seating arrangment.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main transformation: the former staff dining rooms become takeaway and coffee areas, a salad bar is added, and outdoor seating with a barbecue is introduced. You also note that the kitchen now serves hot meals and that the bin becomes recycling bins. These details show good coverage of the plans, and your opening overview captures the expansion. Some features are less fully or precisely reported, however: the central seating area is not described as reduced in the plan, and the new southern doors are described as being “along the toilets,” which misstates their position. The overview could also distinguish more clearly between changes inside and outside. More precise comparisons and a fuller account of the layout would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable progression from an overview to the original arrangement and then to specific changes, with paragraph breaks helping the reader follow the comparison. Linking expressions such as “Initially” and “Furthermore” signal movement between points. However, some connections are awkward or unclear: “where later on words it was divided” and “The rest were foods and drinks were divided by sector” make the sequence difficult to follow. The final sentence also joins the unchanged toilets, replacement bins and new doors in a way that blurs their relationships. Organise the details into clearer groups—north and west interior changes, then southern outdoor additions—and use more precise referencing to improve flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant plan vocabulary, including “outdoor seating,” “recycling bins,” “take away food” and “salad bar,” which helps convey the changes. There is also an attempt to vary wording with phrases such as “expanded” and “replacing.” However, several choices are imprecise or unnatural for describing a plan: “newly formed design,” “specific kind of guest,” “minimalising the tables and chairs space” and “gates” for the new doors. Spelling errors such as “intial,” “Coffe,” “dinning” and “toiets” also reduce accuracy. Aim for standard, precise terms such as “redesigned layout,” “customers,” “seating area” and “entrances,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “where” and “while,” and the main changes are generally understandable. However, some sentence structures are faulty or incomplete. For example, “The pictures Illustrates” has subject–verb disagreement, while “The rest were foods and drinks were divided by sector” contains a broken clause. The opening overview also uses an awkward construction: “by adding extra outdoor seats … In addition, adding new sectors.” Articles and prepositions are sometimes missing or misplaced, and punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent. Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and use past tense consistently for the former layout and present tense for the current one.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.