Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-13
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In recent years, a lot of traditional activities were replaced by technological. Some people argue that traditional theaters and cinemas are no necessary beacuse of convenient online entertainment, whereas others believe that both theaters and cinema are still important for our local economy and cultures. In my opinion, I believes that older theatres and cinemas no longer need because technology offers a lot benefits such as cheapest and convenience.
On the one hand, many individual argue that both industry is essential for economy and culture. Recently, in the world , more than half of countries gained major local GDP from their film industries. Although several factors depend for economic stability in a country, film industry play vital role on contrie's ecomony. For example, India earned approximately 70% of thier overall budget from film industy. Furthemore, traditional history reflect through different events, such as carnival, theater shows, and local cinemas. If a contry stop these softs of envents, it may hide that county's previous history from youger generations, so next genrations may reduce their love from owns countries.
On the other hand, in the modern era, technoly has changed how people perceive entertainment from differents sources. Technology offers cheaper and convenient entertainment facilities than traditional cinema based entertainments. Recently, a lot of tools and platfoms offer entertainment videos in online without any cost, such as Youtube, NetFlex, and Facebook. Digital technology also offer fatser entertainments facilities. As a result, I argues that older cinmes no longer needed.
In conclusion, although traditional theatares and cinemas is crucial for both economically and culturally, digital technology offer better opportunities, such as cheaper ad faster entertainments. I personally believe that traditioanls system are unnecessary.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and state a clear opinion: you explain the economic and cultural case for theatres and cinemas, then argue that online entertainment is cheaper and more convenient. This covers the main parts of the task. However, the support is uneven. The claim that more than half of countries gain major GDP from film industries and the example that India earns 70% of its overall budget are not explained or substantiated, so they do not convincingly develop the economic point. The cultural argument about preserving history is relevant but could be linked more directly to the value of live venues. Your position is clear, though the conclusion would be stronger if it acknowledged the opposing view before explaining why online access outweighs it.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The contrast between the two main arguments is easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. Some connections within paragraphs are less clear or feel mechanical. For example, the move from film-industry income to cultural events in the first body paragraph is abrupt, and “As a result” does not clearly show how faster online entertainment leads to the conclusion that cinemas are unnecessary. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, as in “that county's previous history.” Develop a more explicit link between each claim and its example, and vary transitions so the argument progresses more naturally.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “local economy,” “economic stability,” “film industries,” and “younger generations,” and you attempt some less common expressions such as “vital role.” However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “technoly,” “platfoms,” “ecomony,” and “softs of envents” obscure intended words. Several phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “traditional activities were replaced by technological,” “no necessary,” and “earned ... from film industry.” Repetition of “technology,” “entertainment,” and “traditional” limits flexibility. Build accuracy by checking spelling and word forms, and learn common collocations for discussing costs, cultural heritage, and economic contribution.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses beginning with “Although” and “If,” and most of the argument remains understandable. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction recur. For example, “I believes” should be “I believe,” “film industry play” needs subject–verb agreement, and “traditional theatares and cinemas is crucial” requires a plural verb. The opening phrase “were replaced by technological” is also grammatically incomplete, while “no longer need” lacks a suitable complement. These errors sometimes make relationships between ideas less clear. Practise checking each sentence for a complete structure, correct subject–verb agreement, and consistent plural forms, while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.