Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Speaking of theatre and cinemas during the modern technology time, a noticeable amount of people are saying that the there is no need for theatres and cinemas because there is a lot of alternative options online. However, the rest of the people do not agree with their opinion by mentioning the economic and cultural value of these features. My personal opinion about this argument is halfly agreeing with both points of view.
From the online platforms users perspective, they prefer watching movies and series at home, by using modern online platforms such as Netflix and Youtube. Regarding the other benefits of following their favourite shows at home, including being in most safe and comfortable zone, and not crowdy at all except if you have a big family. I agree with their perspective because of the convinieant feeling of being at home. But, there is one possible drawback of using the online platform, which is the price.
From the theatres and cinemas users point of view, they argue with the last people on the economical important and culture value of the old methods. Therefore, it is not only about watching the entertainments when deciding to visit cinema and theatre, it is more likely about the experience of trying the 3D glasses and feeling of being in the middle of scene, the other possible reason is meeting new fans who are intrested in the same genre of shows as you do. The last sentence illusrtate why I agree with the rest of individuals point of view.
To sum it all, both of individuals ideas are correct in some point, therefore I do not think there is no furthere need for the old methods such as theatres and cinemas, we still need them to fill the gap of our social community and make a reason to meet a new fans.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You address both perspectives and give a personal view, so the response is relevant to the task. Your position—“halfly agreeing with both points of view”—is present, and the conclusion supports keeping cinemas and theatres for social reasons. However, the discussion is uneven: the online-view paragraph focuses mainly on comfort and price, while the opposing view mentions economic and cultural value but does not explain either in detail. The examples of 3D viewing and meeting fans are relevant, but they support the experience and social aspects more than the stated economic and cultural arguments. Develop each side with clearer reasons and examples, and state your position more precisely in the introduction and conclusion.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each viewpoint, and a conclusion. This makes the main progression easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “However,” “Therefore,” and “To sum it all.” At times, though, connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “The last sentence illustrate why I agree with the rest of individuals point of view” refers awkwardly to the preceding ideas, and “both of individuals ideas” is not a clear reference. The second paragraph also begins with a sentence fragment (“Regarding the other benefits…”), which interrupts the flow. Use complete sentences and make references explicit, while varying transitions so they show the precise relationship between ideas.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “online platforms,” “economic and cultural value,” “comfortable,” and “genre.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and you attempt some less common expressions. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “a noticeable amount of people,” “economical important,” “the entertainments,” and “fill the gap of our social community.” Spelling errors, including “convinieant,” “intrested,” and “illusrtate,” also reduce accuracy. These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding the overall argument, but they make parts of it less clear and fluent. Build precision by learning common academic collocations and checking spelling and word forms during revision.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex structures, including contrast with “However” and a relative clause in “fans who are interested in the same genre.” The main message is generally understandable, but some sentence structures are incomplete or faulty. “Regarding the other benefits…” is a fragment, while “there is no need … because there is a lot of alternative options” has problems with agreement and number. The final sentence also contains a confusing negative construction: “I do not think there is no further need.” Articles, plurals, and possessives are not consistently controlled, as in “visit cinema and theatre” and “individuals point of view.” Practise complete sentence patterns and check agreement and article use when editing.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.