Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-08-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Entertainment has become a subject of considerable debate these days. It is often argued that in today's modern world, theaters and cinemas are no longer needed because movies are already available online while others believe that they are still important from economic and cultural perspectives. I strongly agree with the former view.

On one hand, people say cinemas and theaters are not necessary for because it is more convenient for individuals to watch all the shows online. This gives them convenience to watch movies at anytime from home in their own comfort zone without having to travel to cinemas. As a result, it saves their time and other expenses such as fuel and ticket costs. For instance, a student can watch movie at home through online instead of visiting cinema. Consequently, online

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0

The response is significantly under-length at only 132 words, failing to meet the 250-word minimum requirement. Consequently, the task is not fully addressed. While you introduce both sides of the argument and state a position, the development is severely limited. The second paragraph is cut off mid-sentence, preventing any meaningful exploration of the economic or cultural importance of cinemas, which is a core requirement of the prompt. To improve, you must ensure you provide fully developed arguments for both perspectives and include a concluding paragraph to summarize your position.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay shows a basic attempt at organization with an introduction and a body paragraph. However, the abrupt ending makes it impossible to assess the overall progression of the argument. Cohesive devices are used in a limited way, such as 'On one hand' and 'As a result', but the lack of completion in the text hinders the flow. To achieve a higher score, you need to structure your essay into clear paragraphs, including an introduction, two body paragraphs for the opposing views, and a conclusion, ensuring each idea is fully linked and developed.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is generally appropriate for the topic, such as 'considerable debate', 'economic and cultural perspectives', and 'convenience'. However, the range is limited due to the brevity of the text. There are some minor errors, such as 'watch movie at home through online' instead of 'watch movies online'. To improve, try to incorporate more precise academic collocations and avoid repetitive phrasing. Expanding your vocabulary will allow you to express your ideas with greater nuance and precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures. There are grammatical inaccuracies, such as 'cinemas and theaters are not necessary for because it is more convenient', where the preposition 'for' is redundant. Additionally, 'watch movie at home' lacks an article. While these errors do not completely impede communication, the limited length restricts the demonstration of a wider range of grammatical structures. Focus on proofreading for articles and prepositions, and aim to use a variety of complex sentence forms to demonstrate control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.