Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-01
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Technology has brought tremendous changes in all over the world. In conventional epoch, technology was less devloped and less platforms were available to watch movies. whereas in this contemporary era, technology has become developed due to modernisation. There are numerous platforms are available to watch movies. It is highly debatable the growing number of people argue that in modern age, theatres and cinemas are no longer significant because people can watch all the entertainment online. other commentators argue that theatres and cinemas are still significant both economically and culturally. I shall discuss both views in the upcoming paragraphs.
The predominant reason why theatres and cinemas are no longer significant in modern age because numerous websites are available. For instance, there are numerous types of websites are available, which provide various options to watch diffrent types of entertainment easily and fastly. Therefore, in future theatres and cinemas are no longer significant. As a result, in modern age theatres and cinemas are no longer use.
As 'beauty lies in the eyes of beholder' Likewise, other commentators opine that theatres and cinemas are still significant both economically and culturally. Firstly, theatres and cinemas have bigger screen and all the new movies firstly released in cinemas which is beneficial to grow economy of country. foe example, people pay to watch movie. Therefore, most of people love to watch movies in cinemas.
in sum up , for my opinion theatres are stil;l significant
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0
The response addresses the prompt minimally, identifying both views and attempting a personal opinion, but the overall development is severely limited. Ideas are repetitive and lack adequate support, as seen in the second paragraph where the argument about websites is stated multiple times without elaboration. Additionally, the position remains underdeveloped and lacks a clear, cohesive stance throughout the essay. Furthermore, the response falls short of the minimum length requirement of 250 words, containing only 238 words. To move up, the writer must ensure the word count requirement is met and fully develop each viewpoint with concrete examples and sound reasoning rather than relying on circular arguments.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
There is some basic organisation with visible paragraph breaks, including an introduction and a concluding remark, reflecting a rudimentary structure. However, there is no clear overall progression of ideas, and the logical flow is hindered by repetitive statements. Cohesive devices are used, but they are often mechanical, inadequate, or misapplied, such as the abrupt transitions between paragraphs and the informal, fragmented conclusion. Referencing is occasionally unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the train of thought. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to ensure logical sequencing between sentences and paragraphs, using a wider and more accurate range of cohesive links naturally.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for conveying basic ideas, featuring frequent instances of repetition, such as using 'numerous' and 'significant' multiple times. There are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and collocation, including 'devloped' instead of developed, 'diffrent' instead of different, and the non-standard adverbial form 'fastly'. These lexical inaccuracies and spelling slips occasionally cause difficulty or hesitation for the reader. To improve in this criterion, the student must expand their lexical repertoire, accurately incorporate less common vocabulary items, and pay closer attention to spelling and word formation.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The text displays a very limited range of sentence structures, relying primarily on simple sentences and repetitive patterns. Attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty, demonstrated by awkward phrasings like 'It is highly debatable the growing number of people argue that'. Frequent errors are present in articles, prepositions, verb forms, and punctuation, such as missing capitals at the beginning of sentences ('in sum up') and incorrect subject-verb agreement ('There are numerous platforms are available'). These frequent errors can cause some difficulty for the reader. To progress, the writer should incorporate a wider variety of complex structures while maintaining tighter control over basic grammatical accuracy and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.