Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Some people argue that the digital advancement, people reduce to go to cinemas and theatres for enjoyment and prefer to watch movies or films online. While others believe that they are still important for financial and cultural. In my opinion that they are no longer impotant becasue technology advancment offering wide range of screens that feel like watching a movie in a cinema and changing significentally in films industries.

The digital advancement offering big screens such as multimedia which feel like setting in cinema and watching movie. Before technology development their is few small size screens avaliable in the market for that reason people prefer to watch the films on large screen. For example if someone watching a movie on laptop with slow speed of internet that is not too much entertainmentally. Forthermore, nowadays the films industries change dramatically. They are offering adult type of movies that families don't want to watch in the crowed. Due to most of people watch moview online in home with their families.

Moreover, some people belive that theatres and cinemas are still valuable becasue they are good for economical and cultural. In the cinemas the films are started by the owner of the cinema. They may promte the their cultural series. It is also essentail for country financial. For instance, if more people come to theatres and cinemas then government will collects more money.

In conclusion, it is often argue that heatres and cinemas are less valuable for enjoyments and people shift to watch series or darmas online while other believe that are still important for economical and cultural.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views and offering an opinion, but the ideas are limited and under-developed. For example, the student mentions that technology offers 'big screens such as multimedia' and that cinemas promote 'cultural series', but these points lack detailed explanation or robust examples to fully support the argument. The position is stated in the introduction, such as 'In my opinion that they are no longer impotant', but overall the development remains partial throughout the essay. To reach a higher level, the writer would need to fully extend each main idea with clear reasoning and concrete examples rather than relying on brief and repetitive assertions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays some basic organization with clear paragraph breaks, dividing the introduction, body points, and conclusion. However, there is no clear overall progression of ideas, and the flow is frequently disrupted. Cohesive devices are used rather repetitively and mechanically, such as starting consecutive sentences with 'Moreover' and 'In conclusion'. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, making it hard to follow the exact logical links between arguments. For instance, transitional phrases between sentences feel abrupt rather than smoothly connected. To improve, the writer should use a wider variety of cohesive markers naturally and ensure that each sentence logically builds on the previous one to create a seamless progression of thought.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The student attempts some less common terms like 'digital advancement', but these are often used with noticeable errors in word choice, form, and spelling, such as 'impotant', 'becasue', 'advancment', 'significentally', and 'darmas'. Collocations are also weak, for example, using 'adult type of movies' instead of adult films and 'crowed' instead of crowds. These lexical inaccuracies and spelling errors sometimes cause difficulty for the reader. To achieve a higher score, the writer needs to expand their vocabulary range, practice correct word formation, and ensure accurate spelling and collocation throughout the essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response employs a very limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentences or attempted complex sentences that are heavily flawed. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including issues with verb forms and tenses, such as 'people reduce to go' instead of people are reducing their visits, and missing auxiliary verbs like 'if someone watching'. Errors also appear in prepositions within grammatical patterns and subject-verb agreement, such as 'government will collects'. These frequent mistakes cause difficulty and strain for the reader. To progress, the writer must focus on mastering basic sentence structures and reducing the frequency of foundational grammatical errors.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.