Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-05
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
There are two groups of people the first argue that auditorium and playhouses are not important in today world. While the second group says that auditorium and cinemas are still important for the economic and culture perspective. I will go with the first believe and there are few reason behind supporting the first believe.
Firstly we are living in the artificial intelligence era like i guess it is the most advance and digital age of the technology. We can find anything online for free to watch you just beware to how things work in the internet and you will find anything everywhere whenever you want and you can just enjoy that thing in your room without wasting money on costly cinemas tickets and transportation. If there is any concerns about small screens you can just buy a multimedia once and it will work for years for you.
Coming to the second believe that is drama halls or auditorium are still important. In my perspective it depend on the satuation and priorities of the people. Most individuals are still enjoying the old time cinemas halls experiences. And they still want to go to the cinemas for movies. They believe it's like a part of their culture which is true. And we should respect it.
The main factor i am with the first believe was the experiences. I had in my university when some time we stuck with our professors in the meeting about the research or something else and we want to watch a new movie or a series. We will just grab the multimedia from the professors room and bring it to the class and enjoy new movies and series on it. Rather then trying to escape from the university to go to the cinemas halls.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views and stating a personal position, but the ideas remain limited and under-developed. While the writer mentions economic factors briefly and focuses on convenience and cost, the arguments lack sufficient extension and supportive evidence. For instance, the discussion on personal experiences in a university setting is somewhat anecdotal and tangential rather than fully exploring the broader cultural and economic implications mentioned in the prompt. The position is stated, but the overall development is restricted, resulting in a partial treatment of the task.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
There is some organisation evident in the division of paragraphs, but the response lacks a clear overall progression. The use of cohesive devices is frequently mechanical, repetitive, or inaccurate, such as 'Firstly', 'Coming to the second believe', and 'The main factor i am with'. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal cohesion within paragraphs is weak, and referencing is occasionally unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow a smooth logical development from one point to the next throughout the essay.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The writer relies on basic terminology and makes noticeable word choice and word form errors throughout the text, such as 'auditorium' for theatres, 'satuation' instead of situation, and repeated misuse of the word 'believe' instead of belief. While the meaning can generally be discerned, these lexical inaccuracies and spelling errors cause some difficulty for the reader and prevent the demonstration of a wider or more precise range of vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response displays a very limited range of sentence structures. Attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty, leading to numerous grammatical errors including issues with subject-verb agreement, missing articles, incorrect prepositions, and poor punctuation. Examples such as 'today world', 'you just beware to how things work', and run-on sentence structures with comma splices are frequent. These persistent errors demand extra effort from the reader and indicate a lack of control over basic and complex grammatical forms.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.