Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the present day, it is widely argued that cinemas are no longer significant as all the content is available online courtesy of the digital era. Others are of the opinion that they are still very important to the economy and cultural heritage. After the digital revolution, all forms of content is available online at the convenience of your home along with having a wider variety to choose from. While these may be valid reasons, I believe the film and theatre industry is still very important to our economy as it provides a lot of jobs and helps people to have a better understanding of their culture.

From the comfort of their sofa, people can enjoy all types of content online. Audiences today prefer comfort over hassle and going to the cinema or theatre involves commute and standing in queues. Consumers would rather stay at home and watch content on their tv's. For example, the increasing use of streaming platforms like Netflix and dropping attendance in cinemas is evidence of this. Furthermore consuming content online allows people to choose from a wider variety of options. When at the cinema or theatre individuals have a limited selection to choose from, which can lead to frustration if there is no option that they like. These reasons show that the value of cinemas and theatres are no longer the same as people prefer choice and comfort over experience.

The film industry employs a large amount of people, jobs like make up artists, cameramen, videographers and many more are a result of this industry. A lot of money is invested in producing high quality content, this requires hiring people of different expertise for different roles. For example, avengers endgame had a budget of more than 1 billion dollars, which created a lot of career opportunities like VFX artists, stunt doubles and so on. Many people went on to get more roles in the film industry thanks to this opportunity. Going to the theatre also allows people to understand their culture more. When they see plays that involve history or old local stories, then tend to understand their roots more. They gain a better connection with the country they live in. These reasons show why cinemas and theatres are still very crucial today.

In conclusion, while online streaming platforms have made it very easy for people to watch a wide array of movies and shows, the importance of cinemas and theatres cannot be stressed enough. They still provide livelihood to many people and allow the younger generation to get a better understanding of their society thus are still critical today.

not important:

more conveniniant to watch from home

wider variety to choose from

important:

now new content, job opportunities, industry makes more contetn

better connection to culture and history

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and give a clear opinion: online viewing offers comfort and choice, while cinemas and theatres support employment and cultural understanding. The position is consistent from the introduction to the conclusion, and examples such as streaming platforms and the production budget of Avengers: Endgame help make the economic argument concrete. This meets the task well, with some elements developed more fully than others. The case for online entertainment is explained through convenience and selection, but the cultural point is brief and general: the reference to plays about history or local stories would be stronger with a specific example or explanation of how live performance preserves culture. The claim that cinemas are less valuable could also acknowledge their distinctive shared experience.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates your position. Ideas generally progress logically, and linking phrases such as “Furthermore,” “For example,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. In the first body paragraph, “These reasons show” repeats the preceding points without adding a clear transition to the broader claim. In the cultural argument, “When they see plays … then tend to understand their roots more” has an unclear reference and interrupts the flow. Grouping related points more tightly and using clearer references would make the progression smoother and cohesion less dependent on formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “streaming platforms,” “cultural heritage,” “career opportunities,” and “VFX artists,” which helps communicate both economic and cultural arguments. There are also attempts at more specific phrasing, such as “a wider variety” and “a better connection with the country.” Some word choices and collocations are imprecise or repetitive, however. “All forms of content” is too broad in context, while “a large amount of people” is not a natural expression for a countable group. Repeated use of “important,” “content,” and “people” also limits flexibility. More precise terms for audiences, productions, employment, and cultural identity would strengthen the argument while keeping the language natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including subordinate clauses beginning “While” and “When,” and most ideas remain understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, though. In “all forms of content is available,” the verb does not agree with the plural subject; “the value … are” has the same agreement problem. The sentence “When they see plays … then tend to understand” is missing a subject in its second clause. There are also punctuation issues where independent clauses are joined with commas, as in “A lot of money is invested …, this requires hiring people.” Review subject–verb agreement, complete clause structure, and comma splices, while continuing to use varied sentence patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.