Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Today, high speed internet and online streaming has completely changed how peoples watch entertainment. While some peoples believe that traditional venues like theaters and cinemas are no longer necessary because everything is available online, other argues that these physical spaces still plays an important economic and cultural roles. In my opinion , although online streaming is very convenient, physical theatres and cinemas remain valuable for society.

On the one hand, many peoples argues that physical entertainment are losing their importance due to modern technology. Nowadays, platforms like YouTube and Netflix allows viewers to watch movies, concerts and shows directly from home. This saves people time and money on tickets, parking, and travel. Furthermore, people have busy schedules, so the ability to pause and watch entertainment at home is much more convenient than planning a trip to cinema.

On the other hand, offers special experiences that digital platforms does not match. For economic point of view, cinemas and theatres bring money to local areas by supporting nearby businesses likes restaurants and cafe. Watching movies on huge screen with great sound gives an emotional experience and a feeling of connection than watching a screen alone at home cannot provide.

In conclusion, even through digital entertainment is much accessible today, it has not replaced the value of theatres and cinemas

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You present a relevant opinion—that online streaming is convenient but physical venues remain valuable—and you discuss benefits of watching at home as well as economic and experiential reasons to attend cinemas. However, the two views are not developed equally: the online case includes several specific conveniences, while the case for cultural importance is barely explained, and the economic point is only briefly supported by nearby businesses. The second body paragraph also begins, “On the other hand, offers special experiences,” without identifying what offers them, which makes the argument unclear. The conclusion restates your position but is incomplete and does not fully summarise the discussion. The response is 33 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop both sides and support your opinion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the intended progression. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, and the second body paragraph’s opening—“On the other hand, offers special experiences”—has no clear subject, interrupting the flow. Some links between claims and explanations are also underdeveloped; for example, the point about cinemas supporting local businesses is not expanded with a clear example. The final sentence ends without punctuation and feels unfinished. Make each paragraph’s main point explicit, then connect it to a reason or example, and ensure the conclusion closes the argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “online streaming,” “physical spaces,” “platforms,” “local areas,” and “emotional experience.” These choices make the general meaning clear and show some range beyond basic terms. However, several word-choice and collocation errors reduce naturalness, such as “high speed internet,” “watch entertainment,” “from economic point of view,” and “a feeling of connection than.” There are also repeated forms such as “peoples,” which is not the correct plural of “people,” and “businesses likes restaurants.” These issues do not prevent understanding, but they make the language less precise. Build a bank of natural topic collocations and check plural forms and word combinations when proofreading.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a contrast clause beginning “While some peoples believe…” and a reason introduced by “because.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but errors in agreement and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “internet … has” should agree with the plural subject “internet and online streaming,” while “other argues” and “physical spaces still plays” have subject–verb agreement problems. The sentence “On the other hand, offers special experiences” lacks a grammatical subject, and “a feeling of connection than watching” is an incomplete comparison. The conclusion also needs a full stop. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and verb, agreement, and complete comparisons; this will make your varied structures more reliable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.