Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-20
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In the mordern world of digitalisation, some people believe theatres and cinemas are not essential for people entertainment, as various online platforms provide the same content, which they can enjoy in their houses, mobile phones or any other place. Whereas other group reccan theatres and cinemas still plays vital role both economically and culturally. I completely agree with the first group, who think theaters and cineamas are not really needed in today's world.
Firstly, with the fast pase life it is very difficult to get full three to four hours to watch a movie in cinemas or theatres, whereas with multiple online platforms like, netflix, amazone prime etcetera. Its convinient for people to watch anytime they prefer like travelleing, in their office breaks or while relaxing on weekend in their home. we don't really need cinemas because it is really easy for us to watch everything online with a subscrption monthly, whereas for a movie or a play we end up speding the same or higher amount of money for just one watch.
On the other hand, it is great opportunity to know about the culture and community with local play or documentery in theatres and cinemas. People get to meet and explore different cultures and it also support the economy as we pay to buy tickets, food and drinks. Plus it provide employment in multiple sector,for instnace hospitality, local actors and musicians.
In conclusion, personally i am not a big fan of theatres and cinemas to watch a movie because of the busy lifestyle. Sometimes it is hard to commute and commit two to three hours for a movie,which i can easily watch online on my phone, computer or televesion while i have free time or in different breaks instead of one go. Although its a great opportunity to mingle with different people when u go out to watch a movie or a play in cinemas. Secondly, definitely it support the economy but online platforms are not free either as we end up paying charges for the applications.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both sides of the discussion and make your position clear: you agree that online entertainment reduces the need for cinemas and theatres. Your points about convenience, flexible viewing and the cost of a single visit are relevant, while the opposing view is represented through cultural exchange, ticket and refreshment spending, and employment. However, the two sides are not developed equally. The case for online viewing receives several explanations, but the cultural and economic benefits are listed briefly rather than explored with a specific example or explanation of their wider value. Your conclusion also introduces the idea of meeting people, but does not fully weigh this against your preference for online viewing. Develop each main point with a clear example and explanation.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting online viewing, a paragraph presenting the opposing view, and a conclusion. This helps the reader follow the broad discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes uneven, and some links feel mechanical or unclear. For example, the second paragraph begins with “Firstly” but then moves through several convenience and cost points without clearly separating them. The conclusion repeats much of the first argument and adds “Although” without a fully clear connection to the preceding sentence. Use topic sentences to establish each paragraph’s focus, group related reasons together, and make references and contrast markers connect ideas precisely.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “online platforms,” “local actors and musicians,” “employment,” and “different cultures.” These choices allow you to communicate the main ideas, but the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less fluent. Examples include “mordern,” “convinient,” “subscrption,” and “televesion”; “fast pase life” and “provide the same content” are also imprecise or unnatural in context. Some repetition of “online,” “watch,” and “people” limits variety. Build a more accurate range of topic vocabulary and check spelling carefully. More natural collocations, such as “busy lifestyles” and “attend a performance,” would make your points clearer and more precise.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including contrast clauses with “whereas” and “although,” and the main message is generally understandable. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence boundaries, agreement, articles and punctuation sometimes make the reader pause. For example, “Whereas other group reccan theatres and cinemas still plays vital role” is not a complete, accurately formed sentence, while “it also support the economy” has a subject–verb agreement error. The sentence beginning “whereas with multiple online platforms” is also a fragment, and several sentences begin with lowercase letters or run together. Practise forming complete clauses and checking agreement and punctuation, while retaining your attempts at complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.