Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 21 · 2026-10-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say that in the digital age, theatres and cinemas are no longer important as people can watch all the entertainment they want online. Others argue that theatres and cinemas are still important both economically and culturally.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
it is often argue that in this modern era, multiplex existance is not significant as all the desried series and movies are accessible to OTT plateforms nowadays. However, some people also believe that these are still economic feasible and necessary for cultur. While both perspective have their own merits, i believed that theatres and cinemas have lost their importance significantly.
Firstly, the primary reason to support my position is nowadays every movies sell their OTT rights prior to releas in cinemas. Hence, exclusivity will not be there as we could see in the previous decades. Consequently, audience can stream particular show by their own convenience irrespective of time and even travelling can be eliminated. Moreover, the unbelievable price rate of refreshment available n theatre disappoints audience from quite a long period. This leads to the decrease in the popularity of the cinemas and people would tend to watch tgeir favourite shows by their own. Another reason is that many plateforms subscription fees are quite minimal compare to the movie tickets that is why i hold this view more firmly compare to other proposed view.
However, cinematic and their sound experience in theatre is unmatched. Individuals cannot have same experience at their home irrespective of how expensive their TV sets are. Also it is worthwhile mentioning that in earlier time artists perdorms drama at theatre which we cannot see in this modern era. Henceforth, that talent may also disappears by the time. This is the main reason for the advocates of the second view.
In a nutshell, Although, unparallel cinematic experience at theatre and acting skills shown in real-time play have a significant role to continue the existance of traditional theatres, I am inclined towards online watching as it is more convenient and flexible. On top of that, we can stream our desired show as per our mood, not depending on the theatre rigit schedule.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and state your position clearly: you argue that online viewing has reduced the importance of cinemas, while acknowledging their distinctive viewing experience and cultural role. Your reasons about convenience, ticket and refreshment costs, and theatre performance are relevant. However, the discussion is uneven: the case for online entertainment is developed with several points, whereas the economic and cultural importance of theatres is only briefly explained. The claim that artists’ talent may disappear is not fully clarified or supported with an example. To strengthen the response, explain more specifically how cinemas contribute economically or preserve cultural practices, and develop each main reason with a concrete illustration.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting online viewing, a contrasting paragraph about theatres, and a conclusion that restates your opinion. Linking expressions such as “Firstly,” “However,” and “In a nutshell” help readers follow the main stages, and the progression is generally logical. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. At times, however, links feel mechanical, and connections between ideas are not always precise—for example, the move from high refreshment prices to declining cinema popularity could be explained more explicitly. Use clearer references and transitions to show how each point supports the paragraph’s central claim.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “exclusivity,” “convenience,” “subscription fees,” and “cinematic experience,” which helps communicate the main ideas. There are also attempts at less common phrasing, but inaccurate word choice, spelling, and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “multiplex existance,” “economic feasible,” “desried series,” and “unparrallel cinematic experience”; “platforms” is also repeatedly misspelled. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than more elaborate wording: for instance, describe cinemas as “economically viable” and an experience as “unparalleled.” Careful proofreading and learning vocabulary in common collocations would improve precision.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “as,” “while,” and “that is why,” and most of the argument remains understandable. However, some errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction reduce accuracy. For example, “it is often argue” needs a passive form, while “every movies sell” has a number-agreement problem; “i believed” also shifts tense unnecessarily. The final sentence beginning “Although” is not joined correctly to the main clause, and punctuation around “In a nutshell” and “Although” is awkward. Review subject–verb agreement and clause boundaries, then proofread each sentence to ensure its tense and structure are consistent.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.